[issue33284] Increase test coverage for numbers.py

Barry Devlin added the comment: Hey, I updated my pull request based in your advice. Could you review it please? Best, Barry On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, 03:20 Terry J. Reedy, wrote: > > Terry J. Reedy added the comment: > >

[issue33284] Increase test coverage for numbers.py

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- stage: patch review -> needs patch type: -> enhancement ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33284] Increase test coverage for numbers.py

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Barry, thank you for your first submission. You propose to test numbers.Complex.__bool__ def __bool__(self): """True if self != 0. Called for bool(self).""" return self != 0 by adding the following to

[issue33284] Increase test coverage for numbers.py

Change by Roundup Robot : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +6180 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33284] Increase test coverage for numbers.py

New submission from Barry Devlin : The __bool__ method in the complex class in numbers is not tested. -- components: Tests messages: 315337 nosy: Barry Devlin priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Increase test coverage for numbers.py