[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

Yury Selivanov added the comment: Thanks so much! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

Yury Selivanov added the comment: New changeset a93a663d6c2fdfbddbda9729c96e2737c0012522 by Yury Selivanov (Zsolt Dollenstein) in branch '3.7': [3.7] bpo-33363: raise SyntaxError for async for/with outside async functions (GH-6616). (GH-6619)

[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

Change by Zsolt Dollenstein : -- pull_requests: +6315 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

Yury Selivanov added the comment: New changeset e2396506606115e785c94ec129eb86e2ed0aa744 by Yury Selivanov (Zsolt Dollenstein) in branch 'master': bpo-33363: raise SyntaxError for async for/with outside async functions (#6616)

[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

Change by Zsolt Dollenstein : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +6312 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

Nathaniel Smith added the comment: Sorry, not sure why bpo decided to reset the priority there. -- priority: normal -> release blocker ___ Python tracker

[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

Change by Nathaniel Smith : -- nosy: +njs priority: release blocker -> normal ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

Yury Selivanov added the comment: Wow, this is a regression that has to be fixed in 3.7. -- nosy: +ned.deily, yselivanov priority: normal -> release blocker ___ Python tracker

[issue33363] async for statement is not a syntax error in sync context

New submission from Zsolt Dollenstein : Since 3.7, async generators can be used in non-async functions. The way this is implemented allows the following to be valid syntax: def f(): async for i in aiterable: pass return 1 The return value of the above