[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Change by Ned Deily : -- pull_requests: -9626 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Change by Ned Deily : -- stage: patch review -> commit review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Change by Stéphane Wirtel : -- pull_requests: +9626 stage: commit review -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: Hi Ned, thanks for this clarification -- nosy: +matrixise ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Change by Ned Deily : -- resolution: fixed -> stage: resolved -> commit review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Ned Deily added the comment: If we are going to bump the tools version from 2.65 to 2.69 for master, we should probably bump them for all active branches. It creates confusion and makes backporting more difficult. Besides, it appears that, at the moment, the checked-in configure files for

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Change by Petr Viktorin : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Petr Viktorin added the comment: New changeset 24f684692070f53b6f6e4dc67b9fe23dbd58655f by Petr Viktorin (Eitan Adler) in branch 'master': bpo-33486: regen autotools files using autoupdate+autoreconf (GH-6853) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/24f684692070f53b6f6e4dc67b9fe23dbd58655f

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Petr Viktorin added the comment: > If these changes are autogenerated, I would prefer that a trusted core > developer create a PR. I got the same changes in configure.ac. -- nosy: +petr.viktorin ___ Python tracker

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Change by Eitan Adler : -- pull_requests: +6528 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Eitan Adler added the comment: > If these changes are autogenerated, I would prefer that a trusted core > developer create a PR. They are fully auto-generated (using autoupdate and autoreconf). It someone else wants to submit the PR, feel free. > Is it safe to bump the

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: If these changes are autogenerated, I would prefer that a trusted core developer create a PR. Is it safe to bump the minimal required version of autotools to 2.69? This can prevent building Python on conservative systems.

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

Change by Eitan Adler : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +6470 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue33486] regen autotools related files

New submission from Eitan Adler : There are few if any functional changes, but this is helpful when making other changes to the build system. -- components: Build messages: 316477 nosy: eitan.adler priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: regen