[issue35165] Possible wrong method name in attribute references doc

2019-03-26 Thread Cheryl Sabella
Cheryl Sabella added the comment: > Or maybe just link to > https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#object.__getattr__ (which > mention about it) will be enough. In section 6.3.1, __getattr__() is already linked to the datamodel page referenced. As your suggested change is

[issue35165] Possible wrong method name in attribute references doc

2018-11-05 Thread Denis Osipov
Denis Osipov added the comment: Got it. But now docs says that overriding the __getattr__() method is enough to customize attribute access. It's not completely true. If I understand it correct, to make __getattr__() work every time you need to call it by __getattribute__ or raise

[issue35165] Possible wrong method name in attribute references doc

2018-11-04 Thread Steven D'Aprano
Steven D'Aprano added the comment: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#attribute-references __getattr__ is the correct method to override in most (but not all) cases. I don't think we should encourage people to override __getattribute__ as the first resort.

[issue35165] Possible wrong method name in attribute references doc

2018-11-04 Thread Denis Osipov
New submission from Denis Osipov : 6.3.1. Attribute references says: "The primary must evaluate to an object of a type that supports attribute references, which most objects do. This object is then asked to produce the attribute whose name is the identifier. This production can be customized