[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Ned Deily added the comment: Thanks for the PR! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Ned Deily added the comment: New changeset e601ef0fa384d149f6759fff3c18762a8c63851e by Ned Deily (Harmandeep Singh) in branch '3.6': bpo-36195: Remove the ThreadPoolExecutor documentation mentioning the initializer feature added in Python 3.7 (GH-12182)

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Change by Harmandeep Singh : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +12178 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: harman786 good luck for your PR, if you need a review. Have a nice day, -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Change by Stéphane Wirtel : -- keywords: +easy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: ok, I was working on a PR for this issue. but I am going to classify it as easy. -- nosy: +matrixise ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Harmandeep Singh added the comment: I will raise a PR -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Ned Deily added the comment: If someone is willing to make a doc fix PR for this, I will merge it for 3.6. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: Thanks for the report. You are correct. The parameters were introduced in issue21423 in 3.7. It seems that this backported by mistake with PR 10958 where minor grammar was fixed with 40a61da40d252626f8b9ff524d76c1f0ccb3a4f7 but backporting caused

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

Change by Harmandeep Singh : -- assignee: -> docs@python components: +Documentation nosy: +docs@python ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue36195] initializer is not a valid param in ThreadPoolExecutor

New submission from Harmandeep Singh : In Python 3.6, the docs for ThreadPoolExecutor mentions the following line: initializer is an optional callable that is called at the start of each worker thread; initargs is a tuple of arguments passed to the initializer. Should initializer raise an