[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Saiyang Gou added the comment: Should we backport this to 3.8? I believe that we should either backport this to 3.8 or document that these audit events are new in 3.9. -- nosy: +gousaiyang ___ Python tracker

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: New changeset db283b32e7580741a8b6b7f27f616cc656634750 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'master': bpo-39567: Document audit for os.walk, os.fwalk, Path.glob and Path.rglob. (GH-18499)

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Oh, I did not know about the audit-event directive. Thanks Karthikeyan. As for backporting this to 3.8 I left it on to the RM. -- nosy: +lukasz.langa resolution: fixed -> stage: resolved -> patch review status: closed -> open

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- pull_requests: +17873 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18499 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Steve Dower added the comment: Yes, they should be. They can also be backported to 3.8 - it was deliberate in the original PEP that adding new events is not a breaking change or a new feature. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: Do these new audit events have to be documented? -- nosy: +xtreak ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +17848 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18478 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: New changeset f4f445b69306c68a2ba8ce8eb8c6cb3064db5fe7 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'master': bpo-39567: Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob(). (GH-18372)

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +17748 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18372 ___ Python tracker

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- title: Add audit for os.walk, os.fwalk, Path.glob() and Path.rglob() -> Add audit for os.walk(), os.fwalk(), Path.glob() and Path.rglob() ___ Python tracker

[issue39567] Add audit for os.walk, os.fwalk, Path.glob() and Path.rglob()

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka : See issue38149. There is an audit for os.scandir(), but it would be useful to have information about higher-level operations. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 361472 nosy: serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower priority: normal severity: normal