[issue41475] __future__.annotations set to become default in Python 4.0?

[YoSTEALTH]

YoSTEALTH  added the comment:

@cool-RR since your patch focuses on ``3.7`` there might be a merge issue.

There might be other place where ``4.0`` is mentioned though. Its better to let 
core dev like Raymond make the call.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue41475] __future__.annotations set to become default in Python 4.0?

[Ram Rachum]

Ram Rachum  added the comment:

Thanks for linking that, YoStealth. Unless I'm missing anything, it looks like 
there's agreement that the right answer is 3.10, and my PR fixes a spot which 
was omitted in the PR from the previous issues. Agreed?

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue41475] __future__.annotations set to become default in Python 4.0?

[YoSTEALTH]

YoSTEALTH  added the comment:

@rhettinger https://bugs.python.org/issue41314

--
nosy: +YoSTEALTH

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue41475] __future__.annotations set to become default in Python 4.0?

[Raymond Hettinger]

Raymond Hettinger  added the comment:

Keep it focused one place — there's no benefit to multiple tracker entries 
and/or multiple PRs.  Do look to see all the places that would be need to be 
updated.  Also, let Łukasz reply — this was his PEP.

Also, I'm not sure that we're backporting anything to 3.7 at this point.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue41475] __future__.annotations set to become default in Python 4.0?

[Ram Rachum]

Ram Rachum  added the comment:

If you'd like me to patch that too, let me know. Also, I'll need a decision on 
whether it should be on a separate PR and if so, to which versions it should be 
backported.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue41475] __future__.annotations set to become default in Python 4.0?

[Raymond Hettinger]

Raymond Hettinger  added the comment:

$ python3.9
Python 3.9.0b4 (v3.9.0b4:69dec9c8d2, Jul  2 2020, 18:41:53)
[Clang 6.0 (clang-600.0.57)] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from __future__ import annotations
>>> annotations
_Feature((3, 7, 0, 'beta', 1), (4, 0, 0, 'alpha', 0), 16777216)

--
nosy: +lukasz.langa, rhettinger
title: Fix mistake in "What's new in Python 3.7" -> __future__.annotations set 
to become default in Python 4.0?
type: crash -> 

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com