R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Seems reasonable.
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4186
___
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Since 'pending' is not implemented, should this be 'closed'?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4186
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
2.6 has been released and out there some time, and there was no cry
about this, so I guess this can be ignored.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - test needed
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4186
___
___
New submission from Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
According to bug 1683368, Python 3.0's object.__init__() no longer
accepts arbitrary keyword arguments. What's new in Python 2.6 says the
same thing has been implemented in 2.6. However, type() no longer
accepts /any/ keyword arguments,
