[issue42611] PEP 594 Removing dead batteries from stdlib

[Terry J. Reedy]

Terry J. Reedy  added the comment:

Until a pep is approved, discussion of its ideas belong elsewhere; an issue is 
only needed for a proposed implementation  Is PR 23728 purely for discussion 
leading to possible approval of the PEP, or for merging regardless of the PEP 
fate?

--
nosy: +terry.reedy
title: PEP 594 -> PEP 594 Removing dead batteries from stdlib

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue42611] PEP 594

[Batuhan Taskaya]

Change by Batuhan Taskaya :


--
nosy: +BTaskaya

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue42611] PEP 594

[Jeremy Kloth]

Change by Jeremy Kloth :


--
nosy: +jkloth

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue42611] PEP 594

[Kyle Stanley]

New submission from Kyle Stanley :

This issue was created for the purpose of tracking any changes related to PEP 
594 (Removing dead batteries from stdlib), and any relevant discussions about 
the modules being removed.

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 382815
nosy: aeros, christian.heimes
priority: normal
pull_requests: 22588
severity: normal
status: open
title: PEP 594
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.10

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com