[issue433030] SRE: (?...) is not supported
Jeffrey C. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Fredrik, If you're still listening, I am gonna try and tackle this one but I would like to know why you or the famous Jeffrey of the Regexp world claims that there is already code in the Regexp Engine for Atomic Grouping? Adding a hook for (?...) should be trivial but I don't wanna re-invent the wheel if the proper stack-unwind code already exists. Thanks. Of course, Andrew (a.k.a. A.M. Kuchling) already asked this question and you did not answer it, so I guess you're not reading this, but if you are, please respond. Thanks! Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue433030 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue433030] SRE: (?...) is not supported
Changes by Jeffrey C. Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- nosy: +timehorse Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue433030 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue433030] SRE: (?...) is not supported
A.M. Kuchling added the comment: Also referred to as an atomic group: see http://www.regular-expressions.info/atomic.html for a discussion. Fredrik, when you say the engine has code for this, what do you mean? -- nosy: +akuchling Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue433030 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue433030] SRE: (?...) is not supported
A.M. Kuchling added the comment:
There's also an alternate syntax for this, called possessive
quantifiers: a*+, a++, a{m,n}+.
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue433030
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
