[issue5347] SocketIO redefines RawIOBase.__del__

2010-07-09 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment: Does anyone need to do anything with this, or can it be closed? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5347

[issue5347] SocketIO redefines RawIOBase.__del__

2010-07-09 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment: r82748 -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5347 ___

[issue5347] SocketIO redefines RawIOBase.__del__

2009-02-22 Thread Antoine Pitrou
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: SocketIO defines its own __del__ while it could simply rely on IOBase.__del__ to do the right thing. I'm saying this because in the C version of the io lib, there is no __del__ anymore, so that SocketIO objects caught in a ref cycle wouldn't