[issue5980] Add bug tracker tasks to PEP 101

2009-05-17 Thread Georg Brandl

Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:

Applied in r72756.

--
resolution:  - accepted
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5980
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5980] Add bug tracker tasks to PEP 101

2009-05-16 Thread Daniel Diniz

Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com added the comment:

We sure could have helpers for updating RFEs and bugs to correct
versions. They could be scripts for bulk updating and/or per-issue UI
shortcuts for Developers. I'll open a meta-tracker RFE for this.

Correcting user reports and requests is also possible, but I'd like to
work on help tooltips and maybe a bug report/RFE wizard first: I'm
afraid that on the absence of good explanations/tips, such corrections
might annoy and discourage reporters. Anyway, Ill open a ticket for
this too :)

Thanks for the feedback!

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5980
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5980] Add bug tracker tasks to PEP 101

2009-05-15 Thread Terry J. Reedy

Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:

Would these tasks, whereever documented, be entirely manual or partly
automated?  I just fixed new feature request #5975 which originally
selected 2.5,2.6,3.0.  It would be nice if the tracker automatically
rejected such invalid selections and selected 2.7/3.2 instead.

--
nosy: +tjreedy

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5980
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5980] Add bug tracker tasks to PEP 101

2009-05-15 Thread Terry J. Reedy

Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:

I of course agree that these tasks should be listed somewhere, but have
no opinion on which PEP, if not both.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5980
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5980] Add bug tracker tasks to PEP 101

2009-05-09 Thread Daniel Diniz

New submission from Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:

This patch would add the following bug tracker tasks to PEP 101 (Doing
Python Releases 101):
 - Add version X.Y+1 as when version X.Y enters alpha.

 - Change non-doc RFEs to version X.Y+1 when version X.Y enters beta.

 - Update 'behavior' issues from versions that your release make
   unsupported to the next supported version.

 - Review open issues, as this might find lurking showstopper bugs,
   besides reminding people to fix the easy ones they forgot about.

These are the changes mentioned in
http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue283

However, I'm tempted to update PEP 3 (Guidelines for Handling Bug
Reports) instead, adding these (and the blocker - deferred flips) as
tracker janitors' tasks.

What do you think?

--
assignee: georg.brandl
components: Documentation
files: bugtracker.diff
keywords: patch
messages: 87508
nosy: ajaksu2, georg.brandl, loewis
priority: low
severity: normal
status: open
title: Add bug tracker tasks to PEP 101
type: feature request
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13944/bugtracker.diff

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5980
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com