[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2011-09-09 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: The revision you linked to seems to say that Georg was the one who added this code. -- nosy: +georg.brandl versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2011-09-09 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment: The revision you linked to seems to say that Georg was the one who added this code. Can you elaborate? Line 355 in trunk was last edited by edloper. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2011-09-09 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I misread the Subversion viewer, it was actually PJE in r45248 (if I read correctly this time :) -- nosy: +pje ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6703

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2011-09-09 Thread Phillip J. Eby
Phillip J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com added the comment: No, I only consolidated the two copies of the code to a single function, in order to more easily add the PEP 302 support. The feature was already there. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2010-11-29 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Patch looks good. One error and style suggestions on rietveld. -- components: +Library (Lib) nosy: +eric.araujo stage: - patch review versions: +Python 3.1 -Python 2.6 ___ Python tracker

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2010-11-29 Thread Chris Withers
Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk added the comment: What this patch doesn't appear to address is that there doesn't appear to be any point to module_relative. Can anyone clarify what the intention of this option is? (it doesn't appear to have any meaningful point from my experience...)

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2010-04-01 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment: Sure doctests should be crossplatform by default when possible. The patch should fix the behavior for windows. It also cleans the doc and code a bit. Can you provide some testcases? -- keywords: +patch nosy: +techtonik Added

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2010-04-01 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment: http://codereview.appspot.com/815042/show -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6703 ___

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2009-09-04 Thread Chris Withers
Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk added the comment: Hmm, I don't think tests will fail, however, there are cryptic docs for this... http://docs.python.org/library/doctest.html#basic-api I don't really get what module_relative is about and I've always run into the non- cross-platform issue

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2009-08-14 Thread Chris Withers
New submission from Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk: Hi All, Line 355 of this code on the 2.6 branch and trunk: http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/release26- maint/Lib/doctest.py?view=annotate http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Lib/doctest.py?annotate=69012 ...contain a

[issue6703] cross platform failure and silly test in doctest

2009-08-14 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment: How about removing it and seeing if tests fail? -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue6703 ___