Pascal Chambon chambon.pas...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks a lot B-)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7022
___
___
Changes by Georg Brandl ge...@python.org:
--
assignee: georg.brandl - pitrou
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7022
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
If you are requesting new `start` and `end` arguments to readinto(), the
way to do that today is to use a memoryview:
# b is your bytearray, f your IO object
m = memoryview(b)[start:end]
f.readinto(m)
If you still want that feature,
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Actually, I'm not sure what is wrong with the current doc:
read(n=-1)ΒΆ
Read and return up to n bytes from the stream. As a convenience, if
n is unspecified or -1, readall() is called. Otherwise, only one system
call is ever made. An empty
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
priority: - normal
type: feature request - behavior
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7022
___
Pascal Chambon chambon.pas...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the memoryview tip - I though I was up-to-date with python's
features but obviously I wans't ^^ (I searched through dict views but
that wasn't it...)
It should be exactly what's needed to replace these unnecessary
additional
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Ok, I've improved the docs a bit in r75168. Thanks!
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7022
