[issue7299] setup.py install doesn't honor PYTHONUSERBASE

2010-09-02 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- resolution: - invalid stage: - committed/rejected status: pending - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7299 ___

[issue7299] setup.py install doesn't honor PYTHONUSERBASE

2010-08-02 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Closing in two weeks if there is no additional information. Please reopen if needed. -- status: open - pending ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7299

[issue7299] setup.py install doesn't honor PYTHONUSERBASE

2010-02-17 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Hello It seems to me that your patch doesn’t fix a bug but adds a feature. PEP 370 says that “distutils.command.install (setup.py install) gets a new argument --user to install packages in the user site directory”, not that the presence of the

[issue7299] setup.py install doesn't honor PYTHONUSERBASE

2009-11-10 Thread Matthias Klose
New submission from Matthias Klose d...@debian.org: Got an user report about setup.py install not honoring PYTHONUSERBASE. Is this by design? If not, the attached patch seems to implement this functionality. -- assignee: tarek components: Distutils files: userbase.diff keywords: patch,

[issue7299] setup.py install doesn't honor PYTHONUSERBASE

2009-11-10 Thread Tarek Ziadé
Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com added the comment: install_userbase is using USER_BASE which is in site.py. This value is initialized when Python starts, and does check for PYTHONUSERBASE in the environ. (if ENABLE_USER_SITE is true) If this doesn't happen, this is most likely because the