Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Closed as no reply to msg106638.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue762920
Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:
--
resolution: out of date - rejected
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue762920
___
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Is there still any interest in pursuing this? Raymond?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue762920
___
Changes by Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: rhettinger - teoliphant
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue762920
___
___
Travis Oliphant [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I will look at the patch, but generally I'm not inclined to give the
array module more legs because I agree that the desired functionality
should be put into the memoryview object and the buffer protocol.
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Raising priority as a reminder to myself or anyone who wants to apply,
test, and document.
--
priority: normal - high
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue762920
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I think this issue is largely superseded by PEP 3118
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3118, which is being backported to
2.6 (see issue2393). AFAICT, the only functionality not available from
the new buffer protocol is the ability
