Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset b72615222c98 by R David Murray in branch 'default':
whatsnew: sunau/aifc/wave writeframes[raw] accept any bytes-like (#8311)
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b72615222c98
--
___
Python tracker
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8311
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Committed in changeset b96f4ee1b08b.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8311
___
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 932db179585d by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default':
Fixed issue number for issue #8311.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/932db179585d
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Here is simplified patch. Added versionchanged tags in the documentation.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32567/audio_write_nonbytes_2.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Here is a patch for all three audio modules. After dropping support of string
(which is meanless) in the audioop module (issue16685) it can be simplified.
I doubt that this should be applied in maintenance releases. Support of
non-bytes arguments in
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
It's because you write an array of integers while writeframes() expects a bytes
object.
Here is a test.
--
keywords: +patch
stage: test needed - needs patch
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 -Python 2.6
Added file:
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8311
___
___
New submission from Jeff Pursell jpurs...@gmail.com:
I tried to create a 4 second file and only heard the first 2 seconds. The file
size was correct for a 44.1 kHz, 16 bit mono file at 4 seconds, but both aplay
and audactiy ignored the second half of the file. I went to this page
Jeff Pursell jpurs...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here's my fix. The left file is the original and the right file is my version.
Perhaps someone should check this patch on a big endian machine to make sure
there are no issues there. I do not anticipate any issues.
416c416
nframes
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Any chance you could create a unit test for this? (The current set of tests
is...pretty minimal.) Also, having the patch in unified diff format relative
to the top of the source three would be helpful (although this one is small
enough
11 matches
Mail list logo
