[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2011-10-19 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I opened #13224 with a patch to change str(class). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue868845 ___

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2011-10-18 Thread Petri Lehtinen
Petri Lehtinen pe...@digip.org added the comment: Ping? I wonder whether closing an issue from 2004 would result in Achievement unlocked: archaeological issue management -- keywords: +patch nosy: +petri.lehtinen ___ Python tracker

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2011-10-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Original report: Samuele Pedroni points out in python-dev that the ... style reprs of Python objects are not documented, standardized or even consistent (e.g. compare old-style and new-style classes). Yet there is plenty of code out there

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2011-10-18 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org added the comment: I think there's nothing to be done for a bug this general. If you find a specific object whose repr() is awkward, go ahead and file a specific bug. In most cases I think people who parse repr() output know they are on thin ice, and would

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2011-10-18 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I sometimes wish that the str() of a class would return the class name rather than its repr(); that way print(str) would print str instead of class 'str'. (Use case: printing an exception and its message: I wish I could print(%s: %s %

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2010-08-08 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment: Georg, did your two patches finish this issue, so it can be closed, or is there more to do? -- nosy: +terry.reedy versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2009-02-14 Thread Daniel Diniz
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com: -- components: +Tests -Library (Lib) keywords: +easy -patch stage: - test needed type: - feature request versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2008-03-17 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: If any work needs to be done on this issue, it should probably be labeled easy. (At least the writing the unit tests part. Making ... reprs consistent is another story.) The unit tests for old-style and new-style class reprs are

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2008-03-17 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I'd rather not label this as easy yet, since there's a decision to be made. I would welcome a doc patch though! Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue868845

[issue868845] Need unit tests for ... reprs

2008-03-17 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think the attached patch captures the most of what can currently be said about ... reprs. I think the biggest offender in terms of inconsistency in the 2.x series is the file object with the repr which does not even start with the