[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
holger krekel holger.kre...@gmail.com added the comment: Seems the inspect.getsourcefile regression now is in the RC1 of Python2.7 as well. I suggest to apply the getsourcefile.patch patch which was attached from David. I tested it and it works fine for Python2.7 and Python3.1. -- status: open - pending versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: I've applied the patch to trunk in r82039, to py3k in r82041, and 3.1 in r82042. Holger, I'm not really familiar with the linecache module and its uses, so I'm not sure what your proposal is aimed at. Perhaps you could flesh out your proposal in a new ticket? -- assignee: - r.david.murray resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - committed/rejected status: pending - closed versions: -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
holger krekel holger.kre...@gmail.com added the comment: David, your getsourcefile.patch looks fine (and better than mine) to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
holger krekel holger.kre...@gmail.com added the comment: Well, maybe we could introduce a linecache.setlines function to give the linecache module control over its internal caching and data handling. What do you think? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Holger, what do you think of this alternate patch that instead makes getsourcefile smarter? It's a simpler patch and doesn't change the API, and your tests (suitably modified) pass. -- stage: - patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17423/getsourcfile.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
holger krekel holger.kre...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks for helping with this! Attached is a patch that adds a keyword check=True to getsourcefile so that findsource can defer existence-checking until after cache lookup. Eventually, findsource will still raise an IOError if it can't find the source file and cannot recover the source from cache. The patch mainly consists of adding a number of tests to specify the (refined) behaviour of findsource and getsourcefile. best, holger -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17350/findsource.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
New submission from holger krekel holger.kre...@gmail.com: Somewhere between python 3.0.1 and 3.1.2 the behaviour of inspect.findsource changed: it does not find the source code anymore for a code object whose filename/source is in the linecache.cache because instead of the previous:: file = getsourcefile(object) or getfile(object) it only does now:: file = getsourcefile(object) IMO it is enough if findsource() raises if it can't eventually discover the source code - i don't see the need to do this ahead. In any case, the r312 findsource version requires an ugly work around within py.test in order for it to continue to be able to use the inspect module with dynamically compiled code. The underlying issue is that at code-compile time no sensible (PEP302 compliantly loaded) module can be constructed because this is only known at exec-time but this is not part of the test tool API and is done somewhere in user code. Proposed fix: revert to r301 behaviour and add back or getfile(object) to the first line of inspect.findsource() -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 105776 nosy: benjamin.peterson, hpk priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: undo findsource regression/change type: behavior versions: Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
Trundle andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de added the comment: This was changed due to issue #4050. -- nosy: +Trundle ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +r.david.murray versions: +Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8720] undo findsource regression/change
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: As I remember it, #4050 was in turn caused by a change elsewhere in the codebase to using linecache where it wasn't used before. Regardless, though, the problem is that findsource doesn't produce an error when called on a binary module. It thinks it found the source code, but what it found was binary data. @holger: can you suggest an alternate fix to #4050? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8720 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
