[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Senthil Kumaran/orsenthil can you pick this up as implied in msg107919? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy type: - enhancement versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Changes by Martin Panter vadmium...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +vadmium ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9008 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I’m sorry to have launched this thread. I hadn’t thought that Senthil is doing a lot of good work on HTTP and URI-related modules, and I wanted to express my feeling that this bug would not get fixed without someone proposing a patch. I didn’t

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment: Conflict resolution takes a lot of time and I can't afford maintaining a separate copy of Python checkout for every patch Then try various hg features such as named branches, or bookmarks, or mq, or pbranch, etc. (or any SVN-facing

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: pbranch is the next in my list, still do not have time to dig all these tools. For now I have these unsolved workflow problems: [...] That's a lot of things which others do not perceive as important or even desireable. Chances are you are

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment: That's a lot of things which others do not perceive as important or even desireable. Chances are you are going to have to implement them yourself if you really want them. In any case, just complaining won't change anything. I am just

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Le jeudi 17 juin 2010 à 13:22 +, anatoly techtonik a écrit : That's a lot of things which others do not perceive as important or even desireable. Chances are you are going to have to implement them yourself if you really want them. In

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

New submission from anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com: CGIHTTPServer should support all CGI scripts, not only Python ones. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 107912 nosy: techtonik priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I suspect this bug will sit here languishing without action, for various reasons: 1) From other doc discussion, I assume you won’t be able to propose a patch. 2) There is no dedicated maintainer for http or cgi. 3) CGI is a low-level, archaic,

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Forgot the conclusion: I suspect noone will want to work on that. (I removed 2.7 since it’s feature frozen.) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9008

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:16:38PM +, Éric Araujo wrote: Forgot the conclusion: I suspect noone will want to work on that. Nope, please don't come to that conclusion soon. It is a valid request. It is not that only maintainers listed

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Sorry, somehow I forgot the ton of work you’ve been putting into urlparse and urllib :) Note that I never said or thought it was an invalid request. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment: I suspect this bug will sit here languishing without action, for various reasons: I suspect this kind of discussions piss off readers of tickets, but I'll continue, as I do not see any other useful public medium at hand right now. --

[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Conflict resolution takes a lot of time and I can't afford maintaining a separate copy of Python checkout for every patch Then try various hg features such as named branches, or bookmarks, or mq, or pbranch, etc. (or any SVN-facing tool you