Mark Lawrence added the comment:
I think this can be closed as fixed/resolved, am I correct?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9055
___
Changes by Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9055
___
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
Hello. I've been finding the way to determine whether
the process is running as service or not. Does this way
work? On my environment, True is returned. I hope False
will be returned in service environment.
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
Oh, I forgot to mention this. I think it can be possible
to disable gui resource on regrtest.py when this function
returns False. (I hope #9931 also can be fixed by this)
--
___
Python
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
I'm planning to try it on buildbot XP-5.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9055
___
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
I confirmed window_station_has_display_surfaces() returned False
on XP-5 which is running as service.
See
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/builders/x86%20XP-5%203.x/builds/1453/steps/test/logs/stdio
(It ran r85362)
--
Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk added the comment:
Fudge-fix committed as r83948, r83958. Not sure what status to set
--
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9055
Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Certainly the 2.7 branch on my buildbot is now OK (3.x is failing for
other reasons :-()
--
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9055
Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk added the comment:
In the interests of moving this forward, I've committed the one-line removal of
the assertion in r83948. Hopefully that will bring this buildbot back to life.
--
___
Python tracker
Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm not sure what needs to be done to move this forward, but as it's a problem
with the test rather than with any actual code, could something be done to
avoid masking real issues? I agree with Thomas that in the absence of any other
solution,
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
components: +Windows
nosy: +brian.curtin, tim.golden
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9055
___
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
To test windows callbacks, I suggest to use EnumResourceTypes() instead, which
is more likely to work in any condition:
def test():
from ctypes.wintypes import BOOL, HMODULE, LONG, LPARAM
import ctypes
EnumResourceTypes =
Thomas Heller thel...@ctypes.org added the comment:
To test windows callbacks, I suggest to use EnumResourceTypes()
instead, which is more likely to work in any condition:
Unfortunately the proposed test doesn't detect the problem in Python2.7 rc1.
It runs without crashing, even if
New submission from Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com:
test_issue_8959_b fails when run from a service (in this case, from a
buildslave running as a service).
It appears to count the number of open windows, expecting a non-zero value. But
when run as a service, it looks like the return count is
14 matches
Mail list logo
