[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-12-13 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Committed in r87225, r87226, and r87227. Thanks, Daniel. -- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: - fixed stage: needs patch - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-11-29 Thread Daniel Tavares
Daniel Tavares danielmtava...@gmail.com added the comment: Replaced all entries of --- see COPYING.txt with the BSD license. See patch attached. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19866/issue9162.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-11-22 Thread Daniel Tavares
Daniel Tavares danielmtava...@gmail.com added the comment: Hi Jesse, Any word from PSF board regarding this issue? I was hoping to fix it and have it be my 1st contribution to Python. Thanks -- nosy: +dBugSlayer ___ Python tracker

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-11-22 Thread Jesse Noller
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: We have to add the BSD header and maintain the copyright clause on all of the multiprocessing files. Apologies for the delay -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-09-16 Thread Michael Fladischer
Michael Fladischer mich...@fladi.at added the comment: Is there any timeline on when this will be fixed? It's currently blocking work on a python-related package for Debian. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-09-16 Thread Jesse Noller
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Michael Fladischer rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Michael Fladischer mich...@fladi.at added the comment: Is there any timeline on when this will be fixed? It's currently blocking work on a python-related

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-09 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: [Cc: p...@python.org] Jesse Noller rep...@bugs.python.org wrote: Yes; the copyright has to stay; but the license data can leave afaik. If R Oudkerk signed the agreement, replacing 'see COPYING.txt' with 'Licensed to PSF under a

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-09 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: If I'm not mistaken, the original code was BSD, so in the absence of a contributor agreement one could include the full BSD license in each file. http://pyprocessing.berlios.de/doc/COPYING.html --

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-09 Thread Jesse Noller
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Hi Stefan - I'm familiar with the license/etc of the original module. This bug isn't urgent; I shot a quick email to the PSF's secretary Pat to confirm we have a contributor agreement however. --

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-09 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: Jesse, there's no doubt that you know the original license. :) I should have been more verbose: My BSD comment was intended for public consumption. People often think GPL if they see a reference to COPYING.txt. --

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-09 Thread Jesse Noller
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Egad No! I gotcha. I'll find out what the deal with the contrib. agreement is. Pretty sure we had to wait on it when we brought it in. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-08 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- assignee: - jnoller nosy: +jnoller priority: normal - high versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9162

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-08 Thread Jesse Noller
Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment: Yes; the copyright has to stay; but the license data can leave afaik. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9162 ___

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-05 Thread Michael Fladischer
New submission from Michael Fladischer mich...@fladi.at: The files in Lib/multiprocessing (except __init__.py) are referring to their license by point to a nonexistent file called COPYING.txt. This possibly needs clarification as if this file is missing or the license is to be found somewhere

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-05 Thread Ask Solem
Changes by Ask Solem a...@opera.com: -- nosy: +asksol ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9162 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-05 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Third-party code contributed to the stdlib is covered by an agreement that allows PSF to use it under PSF license. Comments in multiprocessing files can just be removed (this happened for argparse some time ago). Thanks for noticing this!

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-05 Thread Stefan Krah
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: Éric, I don't think it's that simple. The author still has the copyright, even if he licensed the files under the contributor agreement. At the very least you have to leave his name and copyright notice. -- nosy: +skrah

[issue9162] License for multiprocessing files

2010-07-05 Thread Stefan Krah
Changes by Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org: -- nosy: +roudkerk resolution: accepted - ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9162 ___