Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Nick,
the See also section already points to unittest module; are you asking to
extend its description to mention that's the tool people should use for their
unittest suites?
Cheers,
Sandro
--
nosy: +sandro.tosi
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
Yeah, I think I wrote this issue based on the diff that added the new note at
the top, rather than looking at the existing intro text that already references
unittest and doctest.
No need to change anything after all.
--
resolution:
Changes by David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com:
--
nosy: +dstanek
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9370
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
New submission from Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
Brett updated the docs for the test package to (correctly) point out that it is
our internal testing package and isn't subject to the same stringent backwards
compatibility rules as the rest of the standard library.
A see also link pointing
