Atsuo Ishimoto ishim...@gembook.org added the comment:
+1 for Tony's patch.
This patch reverts fix for Issue1582282 filed by tkikuchi.
I cannot understand the rationale for solution proposed in
Issue1582282. How does the fix make easier to read mails from
Entourage?
--
nosy:
Changes by anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13651/issue5717.py25.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5717
___
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
On the second try it was much easier.
For py3k I saw a post about removing defpath and some of its friends,
with which I partially agree.
Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenb...@gmail.com added the comment:
This issue is a follow-up to Issue 2240 (now closed).
http://bugs.python.org/issue2240
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5722
Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenb...@gmail.com added the comment:
Closing this issue as the main functionality is committed. See issue
5722 for follow-up regarding FreeBSD functionality.
--
nosy: +tleeuwenb...@gmail.com
status: open - closed
___
New submission from Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenb...@gmail.com:
Tests fail on FreeBSD 6.3
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/trunk/x86%20FreeBSD%203%20trunk/build
s/77/step-test/0
Relevant extract from parent issue, post by Guilherme Polo:
Changes by Tennessee Leeuwenburg tleeuwenb...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - tleeuwenb...@gmail.com
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2706
___
New submission from Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk:
tools/msi/msi.py is still trying to copy the README file from the
lib/test directory. This file was removed in r70872. Patch attached
against r71393 of msi.py.
--
components: Build, Demos and Tools, Windows
files: msi.r71393.patch
Andrew Gregory andrew.greg...@npl.co.uk added the comment:
This has been fixed in the 2.6.2c1 release candidate. Thank you for
updating Tix.
Andrew.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5466
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
Looking at the tests it seems that the pure-Python paths of json are
partly untested. In particular, py_make_scanner (as oppose to
c_make_scanner).
--
assignee: bob.ippolito
components: Tests
messages: 85770
nosy: benjamin.peterson,
Bob Ippolito b...@redivi.com added the comment:
Is this high priority? The pure-Python code paths don't even run in
cpython. I test them manually with simplejson by just deleting the
extension and then running the tests again. There doesn't seem to be a
very good way to do this sort of thing
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Is this high priority? The pure-Python code paths don't even run in
cpython. I test them manually with simplejson by just deleting the
extension and then running the tests again. There doesn't seem to be a
very good way to do this sort of
Walter Dörwald wal...@livinglogic.de added the comment:
test_quopri has a decorator that calls a test using both the C and
Python version of the tested function. This decorator looks like this:
def withpythonimplementation(testfunc):
def newtest(self):
# Test default implementation
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
It is a priority because we need solid test coverage in order to
successfully port 2.7 to 3.1 without breaking code or changing
semantics. The original 3.0 port was done badly.
--
nosy: +rhettinger
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Here is an updated patch, completely removing the `encoding` parameter
and fixing docs.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13653/json_py3k-3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
(by the way, all tests pass)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4136
___
___
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
It would be better to have a patch that diff's from the current 2.7
version than to start with the 3.0 version; otherwise, the two will
never be fully synchronized and some of the choices made in 2.6-to-3.0
will live on
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
It would be better to have a patch that diff's from the current 2.7
version than to start with the 3.0 version; otherwise, the two will
never be fully synchronized and some of the choices made in 2.6-to-3.0
will live on forever.
How am I
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
The idea is to ignore the current 3.0 version and just redo the 2-to-3
conversion from 2.7 and do it well this time. Compute the 3.1 patch as
if the current 3.0 version was blown away (reverted).
--
Alexandre Vassalotti alexan...@peadrop.com added the comment:
Victor, Unpickler shouldn't raise an error if the given file object does
support seek(); it should gracefully fall back to using only read() and
readline(). Also, I think you could get a greater performance
improvement by using peek()
Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de added the comment:
+1 for Raymond's suggestion
The 3.0 version of json was more like a last minute patch work than
thorough work. You might wanna svn rm the 3.0 code, svn cp the 2.7 code
to the py3k branch and start all over.
--
Changes by Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de:
--
assignee: - loewis
priority: - critical
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5721
___
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
What do you mean towards the end of the file? What are the offsets of
the two lines? (I'm thinking it might be something to do with the \r\n
lying across a boundary, such as the 4GB boundary.)
--
nosy: +mrabarnett
Collin Winter coll...@gmail.com added the comment:
If no-one has any objections to the xpickle resource included in the
latest version of the patch, I'd like to commit this soon so that we can
be more confident in the other changes I have queued up. If I no-one
objects, I'll commit this sometime
New submission from Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com:
I configured and built Python 2.6.2c1 on Solaris 10 using gcc 4.2.
All tests pass except cmath:
% LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. ./python Lib/test/regrtest.py -v test_cmath
test_cmath
test_abs (test.test_cmath.CMathTests) ... ok
Changes by Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com:
--
nosy: +marketdickinson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5724
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
Refixed in r71400.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1590
___
___
Aaron Gallagher habna...@gmail.com added the comment:
Okay, here's a new version for the py3k trunk. I'm assuming that this is
not going to make it into 2.x at all, because of the API changes. This
patch only touches the python version of the code and adds a unit test
for testing whether
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
If no-one has any objections to the xpickle resource included in the
latest version of the patch, I'd like to commit this soon so that we can
be more confident in the other changes I have queued up. If I no-one
objects, I'll commit this
Collin Winter coll...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok if it doesn't take too long to run the tests (which may imply
implementing something like Raymond's suggestion of randomizing test
order, if you haven't already done so).
I did something similar: if you don't pass the -uxpickle flag to
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
I'll mark this as a release blocker for 2.6.2 for now, until Mark weighs in.
--
priority: - release blocker
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5724
Andy Sk python...@bitjug.com added the comment:
Thank you Henrik. The workaround in the first comment caused some
cookies to be handled incorrectly due to ignoring version on all
cookies, but your workaround is nice.
It seems that the patch jjlee supplied should really be applied,
however,
New submission from jvdias jason.vas.d...@gmail.com:
Please could we have an API in the Python Core for PROCESS
as opposed to THREAD Semaphores , to enable facilities such
as I have done in the attached example psempy.so compiled
C python module.
ie. I'd like to be able to :
'
import
33 matches
Mail list logo
