Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks, Stefan! Fixed (I hope) in r82941 (py3k).
Now I'm puzzled about why the test passes for '?'. But let's see what the
buildbots do.
--
assignee: - mark.dickinson
___
Python tracker
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Merged to release31-maint in r82942, release27-maint in r82945, release26-maint
in r82946.
(And added missing Misc/NEWS entries for this change in r82943, r82944.)
--
___
Python tracker
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - pending
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9277
___
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
This patch is not really accurate; cmdoption *is* the directive where the link
goes to. option is the role to link to them (or not).
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Done in r82949.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9279
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
For the record there has been a sizeable thread on python-dev in the last few
days regarding IDLE. As a result it is extremely likely that IDLE outstanding
issues will be picked up, so please leave this issue open.
--
nosy:
Martina Oefelein mart...@oefelein.de added the comment:
Yes, a warning at the start of the test would at least let the user know that
the crash is expected.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4047
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment:
Now I'm puzzled about why the test passes for '?'.
Somewhere along the way native_table is used instead of lilendian_table,
so np_bool is called.
--
status: pending - open
___
Python tracker
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
I applied the patch to test_smtplib.py only and all tests passed, surely that's
not correct.
Removing the explicit test for a non-numeric port in smtplib.py seems strange
to me, could someone please explain the rationale behind this.
I
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
I suggest that this is closed if we do not get an answer to Brian's question.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Jean, do you intend taking this issue any further or can it be closed?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2813
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'll take a look at this.
--
assignee: - mark.dickinson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2813
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Somewhere along the way native_table is used instead of lilendian_table,
so np_bool is called.
Hmm. This doesn't alleviate my confusion. :)
The relevant part of test_struct looks like:
for prefix in tuple(!=)+('',):
# other
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Trying to run the test and I get:-
c:\py3k\Lib..\PCbuild\python_d.exe test\test_htmlparser.py
File test\test_htmlparser.py, line 326
escaped = upThere#146;s the Cocirc;te/p
^
New submission from Dmitry Jemerov intelliy...@gmail.com:
On Windows, mimetypes initialization reads the list of MIME types from the
Windows registry. It assumes that all characters are Latin-1 encoded, and fails
when it's not the case, with the following exception:
Traceback (most recent
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Alexy, there would be a much better chance of getting this accepted if you
could supply a patch file that also included unit tests.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, aronacher
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Anyone interested in taking this forward?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3022
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
nosy: +tjreedy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3068
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Anyone with knowledge of cookies and/or regexes who could review this? The
patch isn't that big and includes unit tests. Note also Trent's offer to check
it in and patch py3k.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment:
Mark Dickinson rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Somewhere along the way native_table is used instead of lilendian_table,
so np_bool is called.
Hmm. This doesn't alleviate my confusion. :)
I suppose I sounded a bit like the Oracle of
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Sean has stated that the patch seems fine, what needs to be done to take this
forward?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3119
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment:
I've uploaded a new patch with additions to the docs. Let me know if it is ok
or if you have any suggested amendments.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18049/contextlib_docs.patch
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ah yes; I missed that bit of PyInit__struct; thank you!
Setting to pending; I'll close once the buildbots have reported back (it might
take some days for the ARM buildbots to catch up).
Many thanks for the diagnosis.
--
status:
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Applied, with small changes, in r82951.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9110
___
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
There's some dead code in xmlparse_ParseFile() in Modules/pyexpat.c: the file
pointer fp is always NULL, and as such the following code can never get
entered into:
if (fp) {
bytes_read = fread(buf, sizeof(char), BUF_SIZE,
ipatrol ipatrol6...@yahoo.com added the comment:
I noticed that the directions from mathworks are no longer correct. The only
optional feature is a 64 bit SQL server. Yet I still can't get it to work
correctly. Does MS no longer provide the compiler in their free editions?
--
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
Some of them currently raise IOError. Fortunately, UnsupportedOperation
inherits from IOError, which means compatibility can be preserved.
Contrast:
open(LICENSE).write(bar)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
ipatrol ipatrol6...@yahoo.com added the comment:
HAHA DISREGARD THAT, WRONG DOWNLOAD. However, the C++ compiler `is` now
installed by default. P.S: that second ValueError?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7511
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Another kind of unsupported operation is non-absolute seeking on a
TextIOWrapper:
open(LICENSE).seek(1, 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
IOError: can't do nonzero cur-relative seeks
--
Changes by Reid Kleckner r...@mit.edu:
--
assignee: - rnk
keywords: +needs review -patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6643
___
Changes by Reid Kleckner r...@mit.edu:
--
assignee: - rnk
dependencies: +Throw away more radioactive locks that could be held across a
fork in threading.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6642
New submission from Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
internal_print() is called from only one place, with the `nesting` argument
wired to 0, therefore the following chunk of code in internal_print() never
gets a chance to be executed:
if (nesting 10) {
New submission from Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
I noticed test_close_open_print_buffered(test_file) sometimes crashes on
release26-maint branch. This is most problamatic part in my python2.6 test
survey on VC6 + Win2K.
Here is stacktrace.
_write_lk(int 6, const void *
Reid Kleckner r...@mit.edu added the comment:
Waiting until the portability hacks for gettimeofday make it into core Python.
--
dependencies: +Make gettimeofday available in time module
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
keywords: +easy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9294
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
I saw value of local variable *thread* was 5384 and internal buffer's address
was 0x102618c8 (sorry, this is another stacktrace which differs from previous
one)
thread(5384) func(file_close): enter
thread(5384)
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9295
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
I saw value of local variable *thread* was 5384 and internal buffer's
address was 0x102618c8 (sorry, this is another stacktrace which differs
from previous one)
thread(5384) func(file_close): enter
thread(5384)
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18051/py26_debug_threaded_close.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9295
___
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
I created a patch to workaround this crash. But I saw another problamatic
phenomenon Error without exception set.
I confirmed PyErr_Occurred() returns TRUE when leaving file_close() on error,
but I gave up.
Reid Kleckner r...@mit.edu added the comment:
It's using the old Python 2 unicode string literal syntax.
It also doesn't keep to 80 cols.
I'd also rather continue using a lazily initialized dict instead of catching a
KeyError for apos;.
I also feel that with the changes to Unicode in py3k,
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
The test_float failure is still extant.
Here's the output of gcc -v on this buildbot, for use in any gcc bug report:
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-linux-gnueabi
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.4.4-6'
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
The proposed resolution is wrong. As the comment says, there is a specific
reason why f-fp is NULLed at this point.
It appears that maybe MSVCRT is not entirely thread-safe with respect to
buffered file I/O. Perhaps the test can simply be
New submission from Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com:
Under Python 2.6 the json encoder raised a TypeError when it encountered
dictionary keys that were not strings. Under 2.7, that exception has changed
to a ValueError, but the documentation still says it raises TypeError. I'm not
Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:
The attached file json_skipkeys.py illustrates the problem.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18053/json_skipkeys.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Added some test code to the configure script in r82957; if the corresponding
configure test fails, this snippet can be used in the gcc bug report.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Looking into the code, I see in _json.c that a ValueError is raised by
encoder_listencode_dict() on line 2150, but in the pure-Python implementation
in json/encoder.py a TypeError is raised by _make_iterencode() on line 376.
--
Changes by Matt Joiner anacro...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +anacrolix
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6627
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
This is a link: (http://www.python.org)
--
nosy: +loewis
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1902
___
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
And another think: http://www.microsoft.com/VS(1234.foo).aspx
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1902
___
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
Maybe I am wrong, but when another thread calls File.close(), there is no
system call on the code path, so I think still crash can happen nevertheless
system call is thread safe.
--
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Maybe I am wrong, but when another thread calls File.close(), there is
no system call on the code path,
There is, and that's precisely what's the various tests test for.
(closing a file from a thread while it's being used from another thread)
Jean Brouwers mrje...@gmail.com added the comment:
Mark L,
No, I do not intend to take this issue further. Rather the opposite, it should
probably be paired down based on the recent comments. Specifically, use
PyOS_double_to_string, remove support for long double and perhaps more.
Also,
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
Hmm, correct me if following understanding is wrong somewhere...
1. File.close() is actually file_close(), and is calling close_the_file().
2. Returns immediately because local_fp == f-f_fp is already NULL.
The return value is
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
I forgot to mention that I didn't see any Error without exception set by my
last patch. I agree f-f_fp = NULL; is needed there. ;-)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Reid Kleckner r...@mit.edu:
--
nosy: +rnk
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5872
___
___
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
Removed file:
http://bugs.python.org/file10140/IDLE_standardize_dialogs.080429.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2053
___
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
Removed file:
http://bugs.python.org/file10556/IDLE_standardize_dialogs.080609.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2053
___
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
assignee: - belopolsky
stage: - needs patch
type: - behavior
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4938
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Hmm, correct me if following understanding is wrong somewhere...
1. File.close() is actually file_close(), and is calling close_the_file().
2. Returns immediately because local_fp == f-f_fp is already NULL.
The return value is None.
I
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Does the following patch solve your issue?
Index: Python/ceval.c
===
--- Python/ceval.c (révision 82959)
+++ Python/ceval.c (copie de travail)
@@ -1763,6 +1763,8 @@
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Closing as Jean has no interest in keeping it open.
--
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2813
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
@Mark Dickinson you've shown some interest, could you run with this?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3130
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Could someone with knowledge of httplib please move this forward, all the
comments I see are positive.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Narnie Harshoe signupli...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hello,
I am impressed by the activity here. I am a new programmer and cutting my teeth
with python. I wish I knew how to do a patch and write unit tests, but I'm just
not there yet.
I can show a test case in this fashion where it fails.
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Loads of comments about backports, can this be closed or are there still any
outstanding issues?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Narnie Harshoe signupli...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm sorry, but the last lines in the interpreter reflect my code changes which
seemed to not be sufficient, but it shows that just for this case at least, it
corrects it and allows it to be run in /bin/bash shells (much of my shell code
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Is there anyone who can provide this issue with a bit of TLC as it's almost the
2nd birthday?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
This appears to have slipped under the radar, msg94432 seems to sum it up.
Could someone please take this forward.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
This should be closed unless someone can provide a good reason for keeping it
open.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Please refer to msg89022.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, tjreedy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Can't see this going anywhere, might as well close unless someone is really
interested.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Could we please have an update from people who have been involved on this issue
as to whether it can be taken forward, closed as to no longer relevant, or
whatever.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Could someone with knowledge of the Python build systems please comment on
this, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3754
___
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Could someone with knowledge of the Python build systems please comment on
this, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9110
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Has this slipped under the radar? I believe that one way or the other any
performance issue should be resolved if at all possible.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
I believe the two attached patches still need to be checked.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3299
___
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Tarek, has this move to distutils2 taken place so we can close this, or do you
wish to leave this issue open?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Could someone please respond to Georg's comment msg104300, thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4037
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
That would be me :)
In line with the 'consenting adults' philosophy and with the current behaviour
causing real world problems, I'll accept this RFE and check it in soon.
--
assignee: - ncoghlan
resolution: - accepted
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Pawel, could you please provide an update wrt Ezio's comment on msg109448,
thanks.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4080
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Comments suggest this is wanted, can our build experts get this into 3.2?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4111
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
I'm not sure as to the status of this. Could it go back to (say) 3.3, is it
still a candidate for 3.2(.x), or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
msg82783 states code portion of patch looks ok, what do we need to take this
forward?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4254
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Ok so we missed the opportunity to backport this to 2.5.3, could we please get
it into modern versions of Python, or what?
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6
___
Python
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Martin,
Was there a reason for not accepting this patch for the trunk?
--
assignee: - belopolsky
keywords: +easy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
2010/7/18 Mark Lawrence rep...@bugs.python.org:
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
I'm not sure as to the status of this. Could it go back to (say) 3.3, is it
still a candidate for 3.2(.x), or what?
It can't
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
+1!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4111
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
If any RedHat/Fedora people are tuned in, can you give us an update on
Systemtap/DTrace support in RedHat/Fedora python? I understand that one of the
main problems with bringing this upstream was the lack of uniformity
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
issue2636-20100719.zip is a new version of the regex module.
Just a few more tweaks for speed.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18054/issue2636-20100719.zip
___
Python tracker
Matt Giuca matt.gi...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for doing that, Senthil.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1712522
___
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
dependencies: +Single-line option to pygettext.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7962
___
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
A rare example of a 5-year old patch that still applies with only a minor
tweak. This is probably a sign that pygettext itself has not been kept up to
date. In any case, I am attaching an updated patch which I did not
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18055/issue1098749.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1098749
___
Vlastimil Brom vlastimil.b...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the update;
Just a small observation regarding some character ranges and ignorecase,
probably irrelevant, but a difference to the current re anyway:
zero2z =
Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp added the comment:
Does the following patch solve your issue?
I tried, but it still crashed. I could reproduce the crash by following
script. It crashed also on Python2.7, but it doesn't crash on Python3.
And when I used io.open() instead of builtin
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Mark L,
This could use some shaking. Please take a look.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy, belopolsky
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1812
New submission from Murilo da Silva muril...@gmail.com:
I'm sending e-mail using SMTP. This e-mail is sent with an Sqlite3 database
attached.
When I send the e-mail in the same domain the attachment arrives OK, but if I
send it to a different domain it comes crashed!!
The file is added with
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
