Eli Stevens wickedg...@gmail.com added the comment:
I see the distinction about the rounding error now. Thanks for clarifying;
I've added more tests as suggested.
Looking at _struct.c, line 2085:
/* Skip float and double, could be
unknown float
Eli Stevens wickedg...@gmail.com added the comment:
More questions:
The current _PyFloat_Pack4 doesn't round to even:
fbits = (unsigned int)(f + 0.5); /* Round */
Is the mismatch going to be a problem? Should I change the _PyFloat_Pack4
implementation while I'm in there?
--
Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com added the comment:
Ned: we could work around this platform issue by including openssl 1.0d in the
OSX installer. I'm not sure if that's acceptable for a bugfix release though.
--
___
Python tracker
ysj.ray ysj@gmail.com added the comment:
Since if one of the two comparing files is empty, gnu diff regards the
beginning line of differences as line 0 (there is not any lines), but difflib
regards it as line 1(there is a line, but empty). Not sure weather is correct
since the practice
Changes by ysj.ray ysj@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ysj.ray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11764
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Just to add another data point to this discussion:
mxDateTime, which in large parts inspired the Python datetime module,
has had a .ticks() method (for local time) and a .gmticks() method
(for UTC) for more than a decade now and so far, I
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Marc, could you maybe write a new patching taking care of the DST and
maybe also the timezone? It looks like you have a long experience in
timestamps :-)
--
___
Python tracker
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +asvetlov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11703
___
___
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset a03fb2fc3ed8 by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'default':
Issue #11707: Fast C version of functools.cmp_to_key()
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a03fb2fc3ed8
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
STINNER Victor wrote:
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Marc, could you maybe write a new patching taking care of the DST and
maybe also the timezone? It looks like you have a long experience in
timestamps
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks for the patch Filip.
Closing this. If anyone wants to lobby the RM for a 3.2 backport, feel free to
re-open and assign to the release manager for consideration.
--
status: open - closed
Eli Stevens wickedg...@gmail.com added the comment:
Made the _PyFloat_Pack2 match the algo in _PyFloat_Pack4, and did similar for
Unpack. This should work on platforms that don't have IEEE 754 floats except
for situations where an INF or NAN is unpacked (this is the same as the Unpack4
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset 76ed6a061ebe by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #11707: Fix compilation errors with Visual Studio
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/76ed6a061ebe
--
___
Python tracker
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
functools_cmp_to_key() doesn't check that the argument is a callable.
table=list(range(3))
table.sort(key=functools.cmp_to_key(3))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: 'int' object is not
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11766
___
___
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:
functools_cmp_to_key() doesn't
check that the argument is a callable.
I don't think that is necessary; it will fail with a TypeError when the attempt
is made to call it. This is the approach we take elsewhere (look at the
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
--
title: test_zlib crashes under Snow Leopard buildbot -
test_zlib.test_big_buffer crashes under BSD (Mac OS X and FreeBSD)
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
--
title: test_subprocess failure -
test_subprocess.test_communicate_timeout_large_ouput failure on select():
negative timeout?
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk:
A version of dir that returns all the members that can be seen by
getattr_static.
--
assignee: michael.foord
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 133017
nosy: michael.foord
priority: low
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset 3664fc29e867 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #11757: subprocess ensures that select() and poll() timeout = 0
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3664fc29e867
--
nosy: +python-dev
Michal Molhanec molha...@gmail.com added the comment:
I've got the same problem with 2.7.1 (both 32bit and 64bit versions) under W7
SP1 64bit. Under WXP SP3 32bit it works OK. What's worse the output file is
empty.
3.2 (tested 64bit version) behaves even worse -- it does not print the error
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1692335
___
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
There's no disagreement, since they're different cases. [...]
What he said.
Should I change the _PyFloat_Pack4 implementation while I'm in there?
No; let's keep the patch as simple as possible. We can open a separate issue
for fixing
New submission from STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com:
$ ./python
Python 3.3a0 (default:76ed6a061ebe, Apr 5 2011, 12:25:00)
import hashlib, pickle
hash=hashlib.new('md5')
pickle.dumps(hash)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
_pickle.PicklingError:
Changes by ysj.ray ysj@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ysj.ray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11605
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Oh, I don't know if it is possible to serialize a OpenSSL hash object
(EVP_MD_CTX)...
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11771
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
1) A multiprocessing worker can not return (return, not raise!) an
Exception. (...) raise an error if multiple arguments are required:
TypeError: ('__init__() takes exactly 2 arguments (1 given)',
class '__main__.MyException',
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Is the failure to round-to-even only for legacy formats, or is it for
IEEE formats as well?
Ah; I see it's just for the non-IEEE formats, so not really an issue. When
the float format is known, the code just depends on a (float) cast
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'd also suggest adding some more to the test suite here to verify that
ties are rounding to the nearest even properly.
And I second this suggestion.
--
___
Python tracker
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
I may have found another use case for this functionality. Currently, the Python
code in heapq.py accepts arbitrary sequences (that are sufficiently compatible
with the Sequence ABC), but the C code in _heapq only permits use of a concrete
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment:
I added a few commments on Daniel's draft patch. However, I'm getting nervous
about the performance impact of all these extra pointer comparisons.
We should probably hold off on this until more of the macro benchmark suite
runs on Py3k so we
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Well, it's two years later, but I did look at this during the sprints at PyCon,
though I didn't get as far as posting it then (I only just now rediscovered the
patch on my laptop).
Python3 no longer has a binary flag on
New submission from R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
I discovered the attached failure case in the process of investigating another
issue. The bug (a continuation line with no leading white space) doesn't exist
in 2.7, but in 2.7 the extra whitespace is not preserved (that is, the
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Why on Earth would you want to serialize a hashlib object?
It makes as much sense as serializing, say, a JSONEncoder.
--
nosy: +gregory.p.smith, pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11767
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset c10d55c51d81 by Ross Lagerwall in branch '2.7':
Issue #10963: Ensure that subprocess.communicate() never raises EPIPE.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c10d55c51d81
New changeset 158495d49f58 by Ross Lagerwall in branch '3.1':
Issue
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
I find this extremely ugly. The correct way to handle this is to use the
generic methods themselves. Really, the type-specific names should only be used
when you have just created the type or done PyXXX_CheckExact() yourself on it.
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
Committed, thanks.
--
assignee: - rosslagerwall
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
type: feature request - behavior
___
Python tracker
James Whisnant jwhisn...@gmail.com added the comment:
Varnish on the sourceforge server has been upgraded and/or reconfigured
(yesterday) to fix the issue that was happening with this file (and others).
Just an FYI that you will no longer be able to re-create the triggering error.
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Metadata can be automatically figured out using regexp matching like
^\d+(\.\d+){2,3}, but for explicit handling there should be should some
callback or msi-specific version property in metadata. In the end it is pretty
logical if
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Wrong code. The last line in the bdist_msi_version_hack override should be:
self.distribution.metadata.version = saved
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
..
mxDateTime, which in large parts inspired the Python datetime module,
has had a .ticks() method (for local time) and a .gmticks() method
New submission from Abhijeet Rastogi abhijeet.1...@gmail.com:
a = u'0'
a is u'0'
False
a == u'0'
True
--
components: Unicode
messages: 133038
nosy: shadyabhi
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Unicode compared using is results in abnormal behavior
type: behavior
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
MAL Since most of the datetime module was inspired by mxDateTime,
MAL I wonder why [ticks()/gmticks()] were left out. (msg75411)
The datetime module intended to be an island of relative sanity.
Because the range of dates
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
The fact that is works in this way here is just an implementation detail. If
you want to compare strings use ==, is is used to verify if two variables
refer to the same object or not.
x = 100
x is 100
True
x = 1000
x is 1000
False
Steffen Daode Nurpmeso sdao...@googlemail.com added the comment:
ysj.ray, this rude workaround manages it yet for me
(self._msg is a BytesParser() generated Message):
if not self._msg.is_multipart():
return
topmost = True
for part in
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I'm working on this. It appears to be a bug in the bytes parser, rather than
the generator.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11605
hasenpfeffer hasenpfef...@rabbittsoup.com added the comment:
I encountered this issue recently in Python 3.2 and wanted to make some
observations about it.
The real problem here is not the KeyError. Though the suggested patches would
fix the KeyError symptom, they do not fix the underlying
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Although there's a (different) bug in the generator, too, I think :)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11605
___
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
This has been fixed with all the subprocess improvements in between 3.1 and 3.2
but the decision has been taken (msg125910) not to backport the fix to 3.1 and
2.7 which would involve a C extension.
However, a workaround on 2.7 and 3.1
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
Closing this as fixed since it has been fixed on 3.2 and decided not to be
backported on 3.1 and 2.7.
--
nosy: +rosslagerwall
resolution: out of date - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
FTR, the answer to my interrogation in my previous message is contained in
Raymond’s PyCon talk about API design: http://pycon.blip.tv/file/4883290/ :)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Lars Gustäbel l...@gustaebel.de added the comment:
I kept this issue open, because I have not yet come to a decision. I don't
think the current behaviour is a bug, but these kinds of errors could be
handled more intelligently.
For example, errors during extraction can be hidden depending on
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
The above workaround still doesn't isolate version modification to bdist_msi
command, because bdist_msi is calling `build` and `install` targets before
doing its own stuff.
Any ideas how to override version for MSI without copying while
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
s/while/whole/
Sorry.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6040
___
___
Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com added the comment:
This changes seems to have been made from 2.5 to 2.6 which are security fix
only.
Closing as wont fix.
--
nosy: +rosslagerwall
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - closed
___
Python
Todd Whiteman twhit...@yahoo.com.au added the comment:
I still see this problem (in Python 2.7.1 and Python 3.1.2).
When testing using idle, you'll need to launch using pythonw.exe, i.e.:
pythonw.exe lib\idlelib\idle.py
--
___
Python tracker
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
..
mxDateTime, which in large parts inspired the
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
What happens is the second value is negated (__neg__)
which causes it to become less than timedelta.min and
that is causing OverflowError.
Yes, and running the test case without C acceleration makes this obvious:
Roundup Robot devnull@devnull added the comment:
New changeset 7d4dea76c476 by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7':
#7311: fix HTMLParser to accept non-ASCII attribute values.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7d4dea76c476
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Python
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
MAL Since most of the datetime module was inspired by mxDateTime,
MAL I wonder why [ticks()/gmticks()] were left out. (msg75411)
Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de added the comment:
Guess you are right...
I did overlook the quoted-string reference in the RFC:
av-pair = attr [= value]; optional value
attr= token
value = word
word=
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Let me state my position on this issue once again. Converting datetime values
to float is easy. If your dt is a naive instance representing UTC time:
timestamp = (dt - datetime(1970, 1, 1)) / timedelta(seconds=1)
Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de added the comment:
Ups forgot to also mention the production rule for token, which is defined in
the HTTP RFC RFC2616:
token = 1*any CHAR except CTLs or separators
separators = ( | ) | | | @
| , | ;
Eli Stevens wickedg...@gmail.com added the comment:
All four changes suggested via review from Mark Dickinson have been made. One
note: the else if (!(e == 0 f == 0.0)) { change was made; this makes the
Pack2 function parallel the Pack4 function slightly less. I agree that it's
cleaner
Changes by Eli Stevens wickedg...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file21497/cpython-struct-float16-v1.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11734
___
Changes by Eli Stevens wickedg...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file21499/cpython-struct-float16-v3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11734
___
Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de added the comment:
Perhaps the best solution would be for the Python cookie module to
gracefully adapt to servers not quoting cookie values as is required
by the RFCs and make these quoted-strings instead?
--
New submission from Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de:
Currently I am receiving duplicates of the notification mails by your issue
tracker.
--
messages: 133062
nosy: carsten.kl...@axn-software.de
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Issue tracker sends
Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de added the comment:
It seems that it only happens when commenting upon an existing issue.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11774
Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de added the comment:
Nope, it only happens on issue [issue2193] Cookie Colon Name Bug
but not for this one.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11774
Brian Curtin br...@python.org added the comment:
http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta is the bug tracker for the bug
tracker.
Also, consider that if you are subscribed to any of the tracker mailing lists
such as python-bugs-list, you might get multiple copies of tracker comments.
Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de added the comment:
Ah, I see, thanks for the input. Will close this then.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11774
___
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Your name appears twice in the nosy list.
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11774
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: -carsten.klein
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2193
___
___
Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de added the comment:
I wonder how this happened...
Thanks for the finding!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11774
___
Changes by Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de:
--
nosy: +carsten.klein -carsten.kl...@axn-software.de
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2193
___
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Maybe you changed your id or registered a new one?
I removed the duplicate one from #2193, if I got the wrong one feel free to fix
it as you prefer.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de added the comment:
Actually I logged in using carsten.kl...@axn-software.de
and the tracker changed my login name to that...
Will issue a bug against the tracker...
--
nosy: +carsten.klein
___
Python
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
Yes, that sounds like a bug.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11774
___
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6191
___
Changes by Carsten Klein carsten.kl...@axn-software.de:
--
nosy: -carsten.kl...@axn-software.de
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11774
___
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
..
BTW: A timestamp usually refers to the combination of date and
time. The time.time() return value is seconds since the Epoch.
I usually
Mark Wiebe mwwi...@gmail.com added the comment:
Just a few small tweaks.
I think you meant to subtract the second term here:
+#('e', b'\x80\x01', -2.0**-25 + 2.0**-35), # Rounds to minimum subnormal
Isn't the x 0 part unnecessary? Maybe a comment explaining why the signbit
function is
Łukasz Langa luk...@langa.pl added the comment:
In my opinion we should unfortunately close this with WONTFIX because:
* adding a feature in a point release is not an option
* this may be poorly documented but most of the standard library in 2.x assumes
bytestrings (and fails with Unicode
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
With 3.2 the situation is more complicated because there is a strict and a
non-strict mode.
The strict mode uses:
attrfind = re.compile(
r'\s*([a-zA-Z_][-.:a-zA-Z_0-9]*)(\s*=\s*'
New submission from Ram Rachum cool...@cool-rr.com:
bool(Counter({'a': 0'})) is True.
Is this wise? I want to be able to do:
if my_counter:
whatever
To check whether my counter has any elements. Currently this seems to be
impossible because of this bug.
Will we have to keep this
Changes by Ram Rachum cool...@cool-rr.com:
--
title: `bool(Counter({'a': 0'})) is True` - `bool(Counter({'a': 0})) is True`
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11775
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti, rhettinger
stage: - test needed
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11775
___
Ram Rachum cool...@cool-rr.com added the comment:
Before coding a test I want to know whether we can even make this change with
regards to backwards compatibility.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11775
Eli Stevens wickedg...@gmail.com added the comment:
Updated patch with changes suggested by Mark Wiebe. I also removed the
commented-out if (!(e == 0 f == 0.0)) part.
It feels like the patch is approaching an acceptable state; after both of you
agree it's there, what do I need to do next?
Matthew Barnett pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com added the comment:
It depends on what kind of object it's like. If it's like a dict then your
example is clearly not empty, but if it's like a set then it /is/ empty, in
which case it's empty if:
all(count == 0 for count in my_counter.values())
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
No, the need for an encoding parameter for read/write makes it unambiguous that
it is indeed a feature.
--
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sorry, this is at odds with how Guido wants bool to work with containers. The
bool check is all about whether or not a container is empty, not about its
contents.
--
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
Ram Rachum cool...@cool-rr.com added the comment:
Hmm... So how about making `elements` a smart object which will implement
`__bool__`? Then we could give it a `__len__` too and be rid of issue11733.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
The goal of tolerant mode is to accept anything a typical browser would accept.
I suspect that means the tolerant regex should stay, but I don't remember the
details.
As for the strictas far as I know the current module follows
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Here is a patch against 3.2, with test. Simple fix, but it took me a while to
track down the critical piece of code.
--
keywords: +patch
stage: needs patch - patch review
Added file:
Filip Gruszczyński grusz...@gmail.com added the comment:
I have a follow-up question: why keyobject_type needed traverse function? From
what I read in docs I assumed it is required for GC tracked types. Why was it
required here and how it is used?
--
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:
We could do that, but that's not the Python way :-)
Really, you should be posting recipes somewhere else to see if there is
interest and uptake. The tracker is not the right place to toss one random
idea after another.
We need
Łukasz Langa luk...@langa.pl added the comment:
How about this? (available for review: http://codereview.appspot.com/4358054)
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21547/issue11670.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
