[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2012-05-17 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov polymor...@gmail.com added the comment: Jeff McNeil (mcjeff) I would think it might make more sense just to make the change to the Transport object. Since there's an argument for a transport on ServerProxy already, that seems more straightforward and keeps the network layer

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy() -- need for timeout-parameter

2012-02-26 Thread Andrej A Antonov
New submission from Andrej A Antonov polymor...@gmail.com: good day! xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy() -- not has timeout-parameter xmlrpc.client.Transport() and xmlrpc.client.SafeTransport() -- not has timeout-parameter too but http.client.HTTPConnection() and http.client.HTTPSConnection() -- has

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy() -- need for timeout-parameter

2012-02-28 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov polymor...@gmail.com added the comment: in this subject -- I think about like this changes (see file example-of-changes.patch) -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24675/example-of-changes.patch ___ Python

[issue21356] Support LibreSSL (instead of OpenSSL): make RAND_egd optional

2014-10-01 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Changes by Andrej A Antonov polymor...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +polymorphm ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21356 ___ ___ Python-bugs

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2014-12-14 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov added the comment: @demian.brecht , your example code-fragment is too big. :-) too many lines -- just only for adding timeout. it is uncomfortably. most people will not using that: most likely they just will forget about timeout (but in *MOST* situations not using timeout

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2014-12-15 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov added the comment: @demian.brecht , socket.setdefaulttimeout([timeout]) -- it is bad practice, because setting this global varible we may spoil other cases. example TCP keepalive [ s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_KEEPALIVE, true) ] and global variables is bad

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2014-12-15 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov added the comment: ok, let's go to other side of this problem: question: why default transport (xmlrpc.client.Transport()) is not setting value of timeout?`` answer: because *unknown* which value need to using by default. in various cases programmer need various timeout

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2014-12-15 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov added the comment: if you NOT point timeout in RPC-client -- you program will freeze or will maked resource leak (with small probability). Assuming a lack of concurrency, your program will indeed freeze until the system timeout has been reached. I'm not sure about a leak

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2014-12-16 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov added the comment: I just will write next code-fragment: import socket s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM, socket.IPPROTO_TCP) s.connect(('python.org', 80)) print( 'is my operation system using (by default) tcpkeepalive-algorithm

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2014-12-16 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov added the comment: in GNU/Linux system timeout has been reached -- means that system timeout will *never* reached. That's quite likely because the system limits may be very large. I tested system-timeout GNU/Linux (on various computers). I waited more then 5 days. system

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2014-12-16 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov added the comment: @demian.brecht , for high probably to catch *infinite_freeze* (at GNU/Linux) -- if we may will run requests of xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy -- parallely: (when running next code -- need to make some network-disconnections on network-router-computer

[issue14134] xmlrpc.client.ServerProxy needs timeout parameter

2014-12-16 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Andrej A Antonov added the comment: good patch (issue14134.patch) ! thanks! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14134 ___ ___ Python

[issue24755] asyncio.wrap_future undocumented

2015-09-30 Thread Andrej A Antonov
Changes by Andrej A Antonov <polymor...@gmail.com>: -- nosy: +polymorphm ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24755> ___