Mario added the comment:
On 13/10/2018 17:37, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> Steve Dower added the comment:
>
> I meant why are you using an embedded application with a virtual environment?
> What sort of application do you have that requires users to configure a
> virtual e
Mario added the comment:
Is there any agreement on what is wrong with the current code.
The key in my opinion is the double purpose of sys.executable and that in Linux
and Windows people have taken the two different points of view, so they are
both right and wrong at the same time
Mario added the comment:
On 10/10/2018 01:11, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> Steve Dower added the comment:
>
> We'll need to bring in venv specialists to check whether using it outside of
> Py_Main() is valid. Or perhaps you could explain what you are actually trying
> to do?
&
Mario added the comment:
On 08/10/2018 17:54, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> Steve Dower added the comment:
>
>> Py_SetProgramName() should be a relative or absolute path that can be used
>> to set sys.executable and other values appropriately.
>
> Key point here is *c
Mario added the comment:
On 21/09/2018 21:44, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> Steve Dower added the comment:
>
> I meant returning the full name of the process is intentional. But you're
> right that overriding it should actually override it.
>
> I found the prior bug a
Mario added the comment:
On 18/09/2018 19:24, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> Steve Dower added the comment:
>
> That executable doesn't appear to be in a virtual environment - you should be
> running C:\TEMP\venv\abcd\Scripts\python.exe
>
> Does that resolve your pro
New submission from Mario :
According to the doc Py_GetProgramFullPath() should return the full path of the
program name as set by Py_SetProgramName().
https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/init.html#c.Py_GetProgramFullPath
This works well in Linux, but in Windows it is always the name
Mario added the comment:
Unfortunately the underlying cause of this issue has not been addressed, nor
discussed.
There is now a way to workaround the different behaviour in Windows and Linux
and it is possible to use the new call to make virtual environment work in
Windows as they already
Pernici Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Yes, I think that the speed-up is due to reducing the number of
shifts and masks.
Changing PyLong_SHIFT to 16 would be complicated; for instance in
v_iadd() carry could not be a digit of 16 bits anymore; writing code
specific for 64 bit
Pernici Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Mark, following your suggestions about using bigger integer types,
I added code to convert Python numbers to arrays of twodigits,
when a 64 bit integer type is supported, and for numbers with size
larger than 20; otherwise the code
Pernici Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
In this patch I added to the patch by Mark in issue 3944 the code
in the previous patch, modified to release memory in case of exceptions.
Benchmark for division on Athlon 64 3800+ with respect to Python3.0:
(1) Python with patch 30bit.patch
Mario Fasold fas...@googlemail.com added the comment:
Comment lines are a *very* common case in scientific and statistical data. +1
for the change.
--
nosy: +Mario.Fasold
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1225769
Pernici Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I have translated in C the algorithm for long division by
Burnikel and Ziegler (BZ), using the Python version fast_div.py
and the suggestions by Mark.
Here is a benchmark for divmod(p. q), p = 7**np, q = 5**nq
digits = q_digits = p_digits/2
New submission from Mario Vilas mvi...@gmail.com:
I just hit this silly bug in distutils, should be quite easy to fix.
When building MSI installers for a target_version other than the current
Python version, the target directory selection dialog shows a wrong message.
For example, here
Mario Vilas mvi...@gmail.com added the comment:
My proposed patch is to change line 506 of bdist_msi.py from this:
version = sys.version[:3]+
to this:
version = self.target_version[:3]+
which is what I did to work around the problem
New submission from Mario Juric mju...@ias.edu:
The implementation of OrderedDict.__reduce__() in Python 2.7.1 is not thread
safe because of the following four lines:
tmp = self.__map, self.__root
del self.__map, self.__root
inst_dict = vars(self).copy()
self
Mario Juric mju...@ias.edu added the comment:
Hi Raymond,
Excellent! Many thanks for such a quick fix, this has been bugging us for
months!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11875
New submission from Mario Vilas mvi...@gmail.com:
When creating an MSI installer on Python 2.7 (Windows, both in 32 and 64 bits)
the data_files argument of the setup function is completely ignored. This
results in broken installations.
--
assignee: eric.araujo
components: Distutils
New submission from Mario Vilas mvi...@gmail.com:
I tried the following:
setup(
data_files = [(sys.prefix_exec, os.path.join('Win32', 'BeaEngine.dll'))]
# (... rest of the setup call here...)
)
This works perfectly when running the python setup.py install. But when
generating
New submission from Pernici Mario:
A trivial optimization can be made in ``pow(a, b, c)``
if ``b`` is even and ``c - a a``
```
In [1]: c = (1 100) + 1
In [2]: a = c - 1234567
In [3]: b = 2
In [4]: %timeit pow(a, b, c)
1 loops, best of 3: 3.03 s per loop
In [5]: %timeit pow(c - a if c
Pernici Mario pern...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
The attached patch uses mul1 in long_mul in the version patched with
30bit_longdigit13+optimizations.patch
Comparison between these two patches on hp pavilion Q8200 2.33GHz
pybench patch new patch
Pernici Mario pern...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
In this patch there is an implementation of the algorithm to convert
numbers in strings by recursively splitting the number in half, adapted
from Fredrik's div.py
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13496
Pernici Mario pern...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
In this second patch to the above patch it is added the recursive
division algorithm by Burnikel and Ziegler (BZ)
from longobject2.diff, unmodified,
to see the effect of the subquadratic algorithm; there is still a lot of
work
Mario Figueiredo added the comment:
This patch is a huge improvement over the current situation, which is we don't
have a cross-platform curses implementation in the standard library.
The alternatives listed by Mark aren't sufficient. For the two reasons given
below:
- The implementation
New submission from Mario Wenzel:
if I have an assignment
a = then a is the generator.
But if I do any kind of unpacking
*a, = # a list of all items
a, *aa = # first item in a, list of rest in as
If the right-hand side is a generator expression, I would expect that
a, *aa unpacks
Mario Wenzel added the comment:
You are right. I didn't even know
head, *middle, end =
worked.
Thanks
--
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python
New submission from Mario Grgic:
I am on Mac OS X 10.11.6 trying to build and install Python 3.5.2 from source.
I only have system Python 2.7.10 , and no other instances of Python 3.x.
I configure the build as follows:
./configure --prefix=/Volumes/ramdisk/python3.5.2
The code is built
Mario Grgic added the comment:
It looks like it is picking up libcrypto.1.0.0.dylib from /usr/local/lib which
I installed there as dependency for other binaries.
Is there a minimal version of libcrypto that Python 3.5.2 needs?
--
___
Python
Mario Grgic added the comment:
OK, after installing OpenSSL in /usr/local/ssl and even after copying
libssl.pc, libcrypt.pc and openssl.pc over to /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig (which
is where my pkg-config is looking or *.pc files) the configure script is still
not finding the correct libcrypto
Mario Colombo added the comment:
Yes, this (or something similar) totally bit me, when for another unrelated
reason 'AUTH PLAIN' authentication failed:
https://gist.github.com/macolo/bf2811c14d985d013dda0741bfd339e0
Python then tries auth_login, but doesn't send 'AUTH LOGIN' to the mail
New submission from Mario Viapiano:
I need this patch to be available in python 2.7.13
https://bugs.python.org/issue23239
--
components: Extension Modules
messages: 292468
nosy: emeve89
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: SSL match_hostname does not accept IP Address
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Whilst I agree that using spec can be used for a similar purpose and I did not
know about being able to do nested definitions via the arguments (the
**{"method1.return_value": 1}, really cool!) I find the idea of allowing users
to halt the mock
Changes by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +2003
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue30541>
___
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Sample implementation using the new class:
https://github.com/mariocj89/cpython/commit/2f13963159e239de041cd68273b9fc4a2aa778cd
Sample implementation using the new function to seal existing mocks:
https://github.com/mariocj89/cpython/commit
New submission from Mario Corchero:
Define a way to disable the automatic generation of submocks when accessing an
attribute of a mock which is not set.
Rationale:
Inspired by GMock RestrictedMock, it aims to allow the developer to declare a
narrow interface to the mock that defines what
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Yep, http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/strptime.3.html does support it even
if it might look asymetrical.
Example:
struct tm tm;
char buf[255];
memset(, 0, sizeof(struct tm));
strptim
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
nosy: +mariocj89
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue24954>
___
_
New submission from Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
Currently, datetime.strptime does not support parsing utc offsets that include
a colon. "+" is parsed without issues whilst it fails with "+00:00".
"+NN:NN" is not only ISO8601 valid but
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +3989
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
nosy: +mariocj89
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31454>
___
_
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4012
stage: needs patch -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Wrote https://bugs.python.org/issue31800 without realising this issue was open
(Thanks for bringing it up Martin Panter).
issue31800 basically just adds the ability to parse NN:NN to the already
existing python isoformat function w
New submission from Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
At the moment we can get an operator that performs multiple "gets" in object
attributes. Example:
>>> getter = operator.attrgetter("child1.child2")
>>> o = mock.Mock()
>>> getter(
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
nosy: +mariocj89
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30699>
___
_
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I've always understood instance as a way to say "I am passing this class but I
want to force the autospec on the instance"
For example, given
```
class X:
def __init__(self):
raise
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4253
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4654
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
At the moment strptime misparses all microsecond specifications that do not
have exactly 6 digits as it is just converted into an int and considered
microsecond.
This bug was introduced with the implementation in bpo-31800
E
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4682
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
Since PEP 338 we can run python modules as a script via `python -m module_name`
but there is no way to run pdb on those (AFAIK).
The proposal is to add a new argument "-m" to the pdb module to allow users to
run `
New submission from Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
When checking on ways to improve coverage of datetime related functions I found
this function that seems not to be used anyware.
It is private and mangled, should be safe to remove.
Creating the issue as requested in the PR:
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +6579
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
As a note
Seems support for the ":" was added in 2015 for glibc:
http://code.metager.de/source/xref/gnu/glibc/time/strptime_l.c#765
Commit e952e1df
Before that, it basically just ign
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I have a patch to add 'Z' support as well if we are interested in making it the
same as it glibc does. (as it supports it as well)
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.or
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +4978
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32206>
___
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
pdb and cProfile are covered.
If no one is working on it, do you want me try to put through a patch for
"profile" and "trace"?
Should I create a separate issue if so?
>From Issue 17473 it will leav
New submission from Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
Add an option to profile to be able to do `python3 -m profile -m
my.module.name` to be able to profile the module the same way cProfile allows
since issue 21862
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 309627
nosy: mar
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4993
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I've created an issue + PR for profile which basically ports the change in
cProfile: issue32512
I am not able to add it as a dependency on this one (rights issue probably).
--
___
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Just finished a draft on the one for trace: issue32515
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pytho
New submission from Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
Add an option to trace to be able to do `python3 -m trace -t --module
my.module.name` to be able to trace a runnable module the same way we can do
with scripts.
As we want trace to not include the lines in runpy I am
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +4995
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Related issue for improved executable module support for standard library
modules that run other scripts: https://bugs.python.org/issue9325
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.or
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks Nick. I've sent patches for all of them but `dis`.
`dis` does not "run" the code.
Adding the -m option is basically identical to just running it on the
__main__.py if the module is runnable or on the __init__ if it
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Hi Jason, thanks a lot!
I’ll have a look to the bug you reported on Monday. Out for holidays atm ^^
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5302
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: -5301
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32206>
___
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
OK, just managed to reproduce it.
This appears only when you run a python script as a module. Running a module
with __main__ does not show the issue.
Will get a patch ready
--
___
Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Sent a PR for the fix. I'll update PRs for trace. profile does not need it
Thanks a lot for bringing it up Jason!
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +5301
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32206>
___
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +5321, 5322
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
pull_requests: +5321
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32206>
___
New submission from Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
As discussed in python-ideas, it would be good to have a recipe on how to
configure the logging stack to be able to log ``ERROR`` and above to stderr and
``INFO`` and below to stdout.
It was proposed to add it into the cookbook
Change by Mario Corchero <marioc...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5433
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Mario Corchero :
Calling dir on unittest.mock.Mock will return deleted attributes.
This is a result of the way del is implemented in Mock, which just sets a
sentinel in the child mocks, so an AttributeError is raised if the attribute is
later accessed.
We can just check
Change by Mario Corchero :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +9476
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35082>
___
___
Py
Mario Corchero added the comment:
iter is initialized by using side_effects, not return_value.
The statement "According to the documentation .return_value should be identical
to the object returned when calling the mock" works only when it return_value
has been used to define the
Change by Mario Corchero :
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Mario Corchero added the comment:
If this is to be done we should not change those tests, I am sure there is code
validating calls relying on its "tupleness". Example:
```
>>> import unittest.mock
>>> m = unittest.mock.Mock()
>>> m(1)
>>>
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Makes sense!
I'd not align them though but that might be my view as I generally don't like
aligning text like that.
Also if you feel that the exceptions read "weird" with the first sentence is
empty, an option might be to say the calls don't matc
Mario Corchero added the comment:
I would suggest applying the fix with the latest version in mind to keep the
codebase clean. If you want to backport it to previous versions of Python you
can do it manually through a PR targetting the right branch.
I think the process is to set up a label
Change by Mario Corchero :
--
pull_requests: +10215
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue3533>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mario Corchero added the comment:
I'll get ready a PR with a good set of tests and the fix for the original
issue. This is quite an interesting bug :)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Agree that it sounds reasonable to just set `__signature__` to tell `inspect`
where to look at (thanks PEP 362 :P). Not an expert here though.
For the partials bug, I'll add Pablo as we were speaking today about something
similar :) but that might
Change by Mario Corchero :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +10234
stage: test needed -> patch review
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Mario Corchero added the comment:
I can indeed reproduce the issue. The problem seems to be here:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/54ba556c6c7d8fd5504dc142c2e773890c55a774/Lib/unittest/mock.py#L1041
The simplified current logic in that code is:
- call side_effect, save the return value
Change by Mario Corchero :
--
pull_requests: +10296
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32299>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by Mario Corchero :
--
nosy: +mariocj89
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36518>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Quite a tricky bug!
Indeed @xtreak the `_call_matcher` is using the `__init__` signature. I think
this is a bug introduced in https://bugs.python.org/issue17015. There is a mix
of the fact that spec in Mock also can accept classes (not instances) whilst
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Interesting, `patch` does resolve it when the patched function is called (see
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/175421b58cc97a2555e474f479f30a6c5d2250b0/Lib/unittest/mock.py#L1269)
vs patch.dict that resolves it at the time the patcher is created - when
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Great, all yours :) I'll be happy to review.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35512>
___
___
Python-bug
Mario Corchero added the comment:
I think this is REALLY interesting!, there are many situations where this has
been useful, it would greatly improve multithreading testing in Python.
Q? I see you inherit from Mock, should it inherit from MagicMock?
I'd say send the PR and the discussion can
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Kooning great! I would Add a test for the following (I think both fails with
the proposed impl):
- The mock is called BEFORE calling wait_until_called_with
- I call the mock with arguments and then I call wait for call without
arguments.
- using keyword
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Note that "handlers" cannot be disabled. This applies only to loggers.
Also, the following code shows that disabling the logger does indeed prevents
all logs in emitted by that logger from appearing:
```
import logging
pare
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Thanks! I was wondering about it but saw no comment about it, issue or anything
in the history. At least we have now this issue :).
Would you like that I move this to `_disabled` and have a setter for `disabled`
that emits a deprecation warning so we can
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Closing as unable to reproduce. Please comment if you can reproduce the issue
and we can have a further look.
--
stage: -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
New submission from Mario Corchero :
Just realised the "disabled" attribute of the Logger class is not documented in
https://docs.python.org/3/library/logging.html#logging.Logger.
Any reason to not have it documented? I'll send a PR otherwise.
This comes as I was trying to point t
Change by Mario Corchero :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +13575
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/13687
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Mario Corchero added the comment:
Note that even if not in the standard library I've seen this attributed used
and documented quite often.
Example: https://docs.python-guide.org/writing/logging/#or-print
I would really suggest making it private as mentioned before to make sure this
does
New submission from Mario Corchero :
Users that want to provide a custom template for the timestamp part of logging
cannot customize the milliseconds part of asctime.
They can use the msecs attribute of the Logger but that effectively requires to
break the formatting in two parts. Note
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
