[issue25573] FrameSummary repr() does not support previously working uses of repr in traceback module

Tomas Orsava added the comment: This problem has already been addressed in issue 27208, and it was fixed by updating the documentation to reflect the new repr(). Therefore, I believe this issue can be closed. -- nosy: +torsava ___ Python tracker

[issue27910] Doc/library/traceback.rst — references to tuples should be replaced with new FrameSummary object

Tomas Orsava added the comment: Hi Berker: It's a bit complicated—this specific issue I opened isn't a regression, because it's exactly the change that was intended: Use FrameSummary instead of a 4-tuple to pass the frame data. If you see the last comment for the issue 25573 you linked

[issue27910] Doc/library/traceback.rst — references to tuples should be replaced with new FrameSummary object

New submission from Tomas Orsava: In the documentation for the `traceback` module, the definitions of functions `extract_tb` [0], `format_list` [1] and classmethod `from_list` [2] mention the old style (4-)tuples that these functions used to return or accept. Since Python 3.5, however

[issue29144] Implicit namespace packages in Python 3.6

Changes by Tomas Orsava <toma...@orsava.cz>: -- nosy: +torsava ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29144> ___ __

[issue31132] test_prlimit from test_resource fails when building python3 inside systemd-nspawn environment

Tomas Orsava added the comment: So the issue seems to be that Python believes it's run without root privileges, but it's mistaken because it indeed has root. -- nosy: +torsava ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.p

[issue29243] --enable-optimizations makes common build commands always need to compile from scratch

Tomas Orsava added the comment: > Oh wait, I expected that "make test" would build Python with PGO, but it > doesn't anymore. Would it be possible to change the Makefile to make sure > that "make python" (on Linux, "make python.exe" on macOS) would build

[issue29243] --enable-optimizations makes common build commands always need to compile from scratch

Changes by Tomas Orsava <toma...@orsava.cz>: -- pull_requests: +1618 ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29243> ___ _

[issue29243] --enable-optimizations makes common build commands always need to compile from scratch

Changes by Tomas Orsava <toma...@orsava.cz>: -- pull_requests: +1620 ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29243> ___ _

[issue29243] --enable-optimizations makes common build commands always need to compile from scratch

Changes by Tomas Orsava <toma...@orsava.cz>: -- pull_requests: +1621 ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29243> ___ _

[issue29243] --enable-optimizations makes common build commands always need to compile from scratch

Tomas Orsava added the comment: I've opened a PR#1478 that I believe fixes the issue. -- nosy: +torsava ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/i

[issue29243] --enable-optimizations makes common build commands always need to compile from scratch

Changes by Tomas Orsava <toma...@orsava.cz>: -- pull_requests: +1577 ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29243> ___ _

[issue27910] Doc/library/traceback.rst — references to tuples should be replaced with new FrameSummary object

Tomas Orsava <toma...@orsava.cz> added the comment: Hey Cheryl, here is the pull request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/6116 -- ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python

[issue27910] Doc/library/traceback.rst — references to tuples should be replaced with new FrameSummary object

Change by Tomas Orsava <toma...@orsava.cz>: -- pull_requests: +5879 stage: needs patch -> patch review ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.pyt

[issue38815] test_ssl: test_min_max_version() fails on FreeBSD and Fedora

Change by Tomas Orsava : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +16917 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17437 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue43113] os.posix_spawn errors with wrong information when shebang does not exist

New submission from Tomas Orsava : os.posix_spawn fails with a wrong error information when executing an existing file with shebang pointing to a non-existing file. $ cat demo #!/usr/bin/hugo $ ./demo bash: ./demo: /usr/bin/hugo: bad interpreter: No such file or directory $ cat repro.py

[issue43113] os.posix_spawn errors with wrong information when shebang points to not-existing file

Tomas Orsava added the comment: I agree that at least documenting the behaviour is a good idea. This bug has seriously confused our QE person with years of experience, and then me when debugging with him. Chances are it's going to confuse somebody else too

[issue43433] xmlrpc.client ignores query in URI ("?action=xmlrpc2") since python-3.9

Change by Tomas Orsava : -- components: +XML ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43433> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue43433] xmlrpc.client ignores query in URI ("?action=xmlrpc2") since python-3.9

Change by Tomas Orsava : -- nosy: +eli.bendersky, scoder ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue43433> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub