New submission from Yaroslav sbojc...@gmail.com:
There's issue while setting password.
I brute-force different passwords for that arhive-file, and it pass with
different, not correct password. For that arhive password is: pass, but that
arhive is correct in python and even extract files from
Yaroslav sbojc...@gmail.com added the comment:
I forgot zip file
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21052/data.zip
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11443
Yaroslav sbojc...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok, i try that example in new versions 3+, and it works there. Thanks
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11443
New submission from Yaroslav :
As I can see, pathlib path parents don't support slicing with negative indexes:
>>> import pathlib
>>> path = pathlib.PosixPath("some/very/long/path/here")
>>> path.parents[-1]
...
raise IndexError(idx)
IndexError: -1
Yaroslav added the comment:
Here's opened PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21799
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41511>
___
___
Yaroslav added the comment:
As I can see here
https://github.com/python/devguide/blob/master/garbage_collector.rst#collecting-the-oldest-generation
> the GC only triggers a full collection of the oldest generation if the ratio
> long_lived_pending / long_lived_total is above a given
Yaroslav added the comment:
Here's opened PR. https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21703
--
nosy: -python-dev
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41
New submission from Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com:
as you can see from below, sys. is used, but never imported (besides a
docstring)
$ git describe
upstream/0.5.0.dev-875-gf06319e
$ grep -5 'sys' /home/yoh/proj/misc/python/Tools/gdb/libpython.py
During development, I've been
Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com added the comment:
sorry -- git describe was by mistake in there... report is based on SVN
revision 82502
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9235
New submission from Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com:
We ran into this while generating documentation for our project (PyMVPA) with
recent sphinx and python2.6 (fine with 2.5, failed for 2.6, 2.7, 3.1), which
relies on traversing all attributes given by dir(obj), BUT apparently
Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com added the comment:
yikes... surprising resolution -- I expected that fix would either makes
__abstractmethods__ accessible in derived types or becomes absent from output
of dir() -- but none of those has happened. Now we ended up with a consistent
non
Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com added the comment:
In PyMVPA we have our little decorator as an alternative to Fernando's
generators, and which is closer, I think, to what Michael was wishing for:
@sweepargs
http://github.com/yarikoptic/PyMVPA/blob/master/mvpa/testing/sweepargs.py
NB
Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com added the comment:
Fernando, I agree... somewhat ;-)
At some point (whenever everything works fine and no unittests fail) I wanted
to merry sweepargs to nose and make it spit out a dot (or animate a spinning
wheel ;)) for every passed unittest, so
Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Nick,
Am I reading your right, Are you suggesting to implement this
manual looping/collecting/reporting separately in every unittest
which needs that?
On Tue, 11 May 2010, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added
Changes by Yaroslav Halchenko yarikop...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: -Yaroslav.Halchenko
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue16997
Changes by Yaroslav Bulatov yarosla...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +yaroslavvb
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9998
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Yaroslav Bulatov yarosla...@gmail.com added the comment:
This causes problem for Freetype Python bindings on Linux
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9998
Yaroslav Bulatov yarosla...@gmail.com added the comment:
Sorry for confusion, I meant the original problem causes problems. I haven't
tested the patch because my target machines don't have gcc
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Yaroslav Halchenko added the comment:
the function getargspec was removed but references to it within docstrings
remained:
$ git grep getargspec
Doc/library/inspect.rst: The first four items in the tuple correspond to
:func:`getargspec`.
Doc/library/inspect.rst: :func:`getargspec
Changes by Yaroslav Admin <devot...@gmail.com>:
--
title: Docs for BaseEventLoop.run_in_executor(executor, callback, *args) is
outdated in documentation -> Spec for BaseEventLoop.run_in_executor(executor,
callback, *args) is outdated in docu
New submission from Yaroslav Admin:
Parameter for BaseEventLoop.run_in_executor(executor, callback, *args) was
renamed from callback to func in 3.5.0 release, but it's not reflected in the
docs.
Commit with change:
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit
New submission from Yaroslav Halchenko:
If tarfile contains a file under a directory which has no write permission,
extractall would fail since chmod'ing of the directory is done right when it is
"extracted".
Please find attached a quick script to demonstrate the problem using
P
Changes by Yaroslav Halchenko <yarikop...@gmail.com>:
--
title: tarfile would fail to extract tarballs with files under R/O directories
-> tarfile would fail to extract tarballs with files under R/O directories
(twice)
___
Python tra
Yaroslav Halchenko added the comment:
Dear Catherine,
Thank you very much for looking into it!! And sorry that I have missed the fact
of recursive addition when pointing to a directory. Indeed though, tar handles
that case a bit more gracefully.
BUT I feel somewhat dumb since I am afraid
New submission from Yaroslav Halchenko <yarikop...@gmail.com>:
originally detected on python 2.7, but replicated with python 3.5.3 --
apparently io.FileIO, if given a bytestring of 2GB or more, cannot write it all
at once -- saves (and returns that size) only 2GB - 4096.
I found no indi
Yaroslav Halchenko <yarikop...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thank you for the follow-ups!
Wouldn't it be better if Python documentation said exactly that
On Linux, write() (and similar system calls) will transfer at most 0x7000
(2,147,479,552) bytes, returning the number of
New submission from Yaroslav Halchenko <yarikop...@gmail.com>:
It is quite often desired to reproduce the same failure identically. In many
cases sufficient to seed the shared random._inst (via random.seed). tempfile
creates new instance(s) for its own operation and does not provi
Yaroslav Halchenko <yarikop...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I have spent too much time in Python to be able to compare to other languages
;) but anywhere I saw RNG being used, there was a way to seed it or to provide
a state. tempfile provides no such API
my usecase -- comparison o
Yaroslav Nikitenko added the comment:
Hello Raymond. Many thanks for your explanation.
In this case I suggest any of the following:
1) distinguish between integer and floating numbers in scientific notation.
Definitely, 1e+6 is an integer. I can't see where else numbers in scientific
New submission from Yaroslav Nikitenko :
Numbers written in scientific notation don't work with itertools.islice.
Check this script:
# a usual function works
## def works as well
f = lambda x : x
f(1e+6)
# 100.0
import itertools
# islice without scientific notation works
Yaroslav Halchenko added the comment:
FWIW, our more complete test filename is
# python3 -c 'import patoolib.util as ut; print(ut.guess_mime(r" \"\`;b
|.tar.gz"))'
(None, None)
which works fine with older versions
--
___
Python
New submission from Yaroslav Halchenko :
Our tests in DataLad started to fail while building on Debian with Python
3.7.5rc1 whenever they passed just fine previously with 3.7.3rc1. Analysis
boiled down to mimetypes
$> ./python3.9 -c 'import mimetypes; mimedb =
mimetypes.MimeTypes(str
New submission from Yaroslav Halchenko :
This is a reincarnation of previous issues such as
- older https://bugs.python.org/issue21595 which partially (with ack on that)
addressed the issue awhile back
- more recent https://bugs.python.org/issue38104 which was closed as "wont fix&qu
Yaroslav Halchenko added the comment:
Might (although unlikely) be related to https://bugs.python.org/issue40634
which is about BlockingIOError being raised (and ignored) if SelectorEventLoop
is reused (not the case here) also in the case of short lived processes.
--
nosy
Yaroslav Pankovych added the comment:
Any thoughts about that folks? It's a pretty old bug, let's decide smth for it.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21
Yaroslav Pankovych added the comment:
Here's possible fix: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/21799
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21
Yaroslav Pankovych added the comment:
That's kinda weird for python. I mean, in regular list/etc if I need the last
element, I'd normally do list[-1], but here to get the last parent, I need to
actually know how many parents do I have.
So now, I can do something like
Yaroslav Halchenko added the comment:
any feedback/ideas/fixes would still be highly appreciated. Thank you!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40
Yaroslav Pankovych added the comment:
That makes sense, but should we have this behaviour only for negative indices?
We'll end up with something lie:
path.parents[len(path.parents) - 1] != path.parents[-1]
I think that is should be consistent regardless of negative/positive indices
Yaroslav Pankovych added the comment:
Agree with that, it currently supports this behavior.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue21041>
___
___
Yaroslav Pankovych added the comment:
And it looks like a special case, so "Special cases aren't special enough to
break the rules."
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.o
Yaroslav Nikitenko added the comment:
I hope it's fine to add to closed topics here.
I agree with the decision that islice should not handle a special case of sized
containers vs iterables.
However, I think that the support of negative indices in islice would be nice.
A simple use case
Yaroslav Nikitenko added the comment:
Sorry for a typo. The paragraph before the last should read
Negative *step* fundamentally changes the algorithm:... flow[-1:None:-1].
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
43 matches
Mail list logo
