[issue37863] Speed up hash(fractions.Fraction)

Change by ppperry : -- title: Speed hash(fractions.Fraction) -> Speed up hash(fractions.Fraction) ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue37863> ___ _

[issue38084] multiprocessing cannot recover from crashed worker

ppperry added the comment: Is this not a duplicate of issue22393? -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38084> ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue38229] ClientConnectionError exception doesn't serialize propertly

ppperry added the comment: This seems more likely to be a bug in aiohttp than in python. -- nosy: +ppperry type: crash -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue38262] Mixins - super calls in bases of multiple-inheritance with different parameters

Change by ppperry : -- type: compile error -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue38262> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue11105] Compiling recursive Python ASTs crash the interpreter

Change by ppperry : -- nosy: -ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue11105> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue36220] LOAD_NAME and LOAD_GLOBAL, STORE_GLOBAL handle dict subclasses for globals() differently

ppperry added the comment: Duplicate of issue32615 -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue36220> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue11105] Compiling evil ast crashes interpreter

ppperry added the comment: What about indirect cycles like below: >>> e = ast.UnaryOp(op=ast.Not(), lineno=0, col_offset=0) >>> f = ast.UnaryOp(op=ast.Not(), lineno=0, col_offset=0) >>> e.operand = f >>> f.operand = e >>> compile(ast.Expression(

[issue39344] ImportError: DLL load failed while importing _ssl: The specified module could not be found."

Change by ppperry : -- title: Getting error while importing ssl " import _ssl # if we can't import it, let the error propagate ImportError: DLL load failed while importing _ssl: The specified module could not be found." -> ImportError: DLL load fail

[issue32615] Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass

ppperry added the comment: I was not attempting to run untrusted Python code when I filed this bug report. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32

[issue39585] Delete a pending item in _warning.c

ppperry added the comment: What if a warning has a metaclass with a custom __getattribute__ method? -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39

[issue39665] Cryptic error message when creating types that don't include themselves in their MRO

New submission from ppperry : I was trying to create a class that didn't have any references to itself to test issue39382 and ran the following code: class Meta(type): def mro(cls): return type.mro(cls)[1:] class X(metaclass=Meta): pass This produc

[issue39382] abstract_issubclass() doesn't take bases tuple item ref

ppperry added the comment: I posted a test on the PR -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39382> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue39665] Cryptic error message when creating types that don't include themselves in their MRO

Change by ppperry : -- components: -Build versions: +Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39665> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue40241] [C API] Make PyGC_Head structure opaque, or even move it to the internal C API

Change by ppperry : -- title: [C API] Make PyGC_Head structure opaque, or even more it to the internal C API -> [C API] Make PyGC_Head structure opaque, or even move it to the internal C API ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue33065] IDLE debugger: failure stepping through module loading

Change by ppperry : -- nosy: -ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33065> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue42849] pool worker can't be terminated

ppperry added the comment: duplicate of issue22393? -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue42849> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue30953] Fatal python error when jumping into except clause

Change by ppperry : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.or

[issue35753] Importing call from unittest.mock directly causes ValueError

ppperry added the comment: Indeed, you are right that this should be reopened. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35753> ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue35753] Importing call from unittest.mock directly causes ValueError

Change by ppperry : -- nosy: -ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35753> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue37830] continue in finally with return in try results with segfault

ppperry added the comment: Unfortunately, there's a similar bug for `break` in a finally inside two nested loops, so just re-banning `continue` won't fix the crash. The code below segfaults: ``` def simple(): for number in range(2): for number in range(2):

[issue13220] print function unable while multiprocessing.Process is being run

ppperry added the comment: Duplicate of issue11820. -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13220> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue30873] `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from imp.create_builtin

New submission from ppperry: The following rather long code, reduced from the same example as issue30626, produces a SystemError: import builtins from importlib.machinery import PathFinder import importlib import sys import _imp from functools import partial def copy_module(module): new

[issue30873] `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle

Changes by ppperry : -- title: `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from imp.create_builtin -> `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue30873] `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle

ppperry added the comment: Interesting. For you, `_pickle` seems to be an extension module, which is thus trying to call `imp.create_dynamic`, whereas for me it is a builtin module. Perhaps that explains why you get a KeyError and I get a SystemError (my traceback ends with): File &q

[issue30873] `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle on Windows

Changes by ppperry : -- title: `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle -> `SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error` from importing _pickle on Windows ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.pyth

[issue30876] SystemError on importing module that deletes itself from sys.modules

Changes by ppperry : -- title: SystemError on import -> SystemError on importing module that deletes itself from sys.modules ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue30949] Provide assertion functions in unittest.mock

ppperry added the comment: You can already do this, although it it somewhat of a hack: >>> assert_called_once=Mock.assert_called_once # This will be an AttributeError >>> assert_called_once_with=Mock.assert_called_once_with >>> example = Mock() >>> asser

[issue30953] Fatal python error when jumping into except clause

New submission from ppperry: trying to execute the following code: import sys def trace(frame, event, arg): if event == "line" and frame.f_lineno > 12: frame.f_lineno = 12 return None return trace sys.settrace(trace) def error(): try: pa

[issue30958] Scripts folder is empty

Changes by ppperry : -- type: performance -> behavior ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30958> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue30990] Calls to C functions using `.__call__` don't get sent to profiler.

New submission from ppperry: If you create a file called `inputtest.py` with the contents `input.__call__()`, and run the built-in profile module on it, it doesn't notice the call to `input`, and produces a report not including that call. 4 function calls in 0.000 seconds Or

[issue34782] Pdb crashes when code is executed in a mapping that does not define `__contains__`

ppperry added the comment: The thing is, though, that the same error occurs if a larger code being debugged calls `exec` or `eval` with such a mapping (`pdb.run("eval('1+1',{},FakeContainer())" also crashes with the same error), and the test suite contains code that ev

[issue35753] Importing call from unittest.mock directly causes ValueError

ppperry added the comment: According to the error message, this is a duplicate of https://bugs.python.org/issue25532 -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue35

[issue35753] Importing call from unittest.mock directly causes ValueError

ppperry added the comment: Sorry, looks like I was wrong about it being a duplicate. The actual bug appears to be "doctest can't run on a module that contains un-unwrappable objects", which there probably is an issue for but I don&#x

[issue34782] Pdb crashes when code is executed in a mapping that does not define `__contains__`

ppperry added the comment: You have to step into the eval for the error to be raised. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34782> ___ ___ Pytho

[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance

ppperry added the comment: Does this work with wacky code like this? @functools.total_ordering class ClassAssignmentCanBreakChecks(): def __init__(self, i): self._i = i def __lt__ (self, other): last

[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance

ppperry added the comment: > > Elliot Gorokhovsky added the comment: > > Your code changes __class__, not type, which would remain equal to > "instance". (my understanding, could be wrong). The docs say the > following: > Nope: class A:pass class B:pass

[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance

ppperry added the comment: And what about even wackier code like this? class A(int): def __lt__(self, other): print("zebra") A.__lt__ = A.__false_lt__ return int.__lt__(self, other) __true_lt__ = __lt__ def __false

[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance

ppperry added the comment: What about if one of the relevant comparison functions is implemented in C? class WackyComparator(int): def __lt__(self, other): elem.__class__ = WackyList2 return int.__lt__(self, other

[issue29794] Incorrect error message on invalid __class__ assignments

New submission from ppperry: If you try to set the __class__ of a type which doesn't support "__class__" assignments, you get the error message: TypeError: __class__ assignment only supported for heap types or ModuleType subclasses However, the actual restriction do

[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance

ppperry added the comment: Wouldn't the assignment of "__lt__" change the value of the tp_richcompare slot? That seems to be what the code in Objects/typeobject.c is doing with the update_slot method and the related helper functions. -- ___

[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance

ppperry added the comment: - Doesn't youre skipping PyObject_RichCompareBool and directly getting tp_richcompare also mean that you bypass the NotImplemented checking? Thus, wouldn't this code, which raises a TypeError currently, silently work? class PointlessComparator:

[issue19675] Pool dies with excessive workers, but does not cleanup

ppperry added the comment: Can't you just mock the Process class to have a start method that always raises an error? -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/is

[issue19791] test_pathlib should use can_symlink or skip_unless_symlink from test.support

Changes by ppperry : -- pull_requests: +729 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue19791> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue30626] "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error

Changes by ppperry : -- nosy: ppperry priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/is

[issue30626] "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function

New submission from ppperry: This code (reduced from an example I had of trying to debug code including the module-level code of already imported modules), raises a SystemError: import builtins from importlib.machinery import PathFinder from importlib.util import find_spec import importlib

[issue30626] "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function

Changes by ppperry : -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, eric.snow, ncoghlan, stutzbach ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30626> ___ ___ Pytho

[issue30626] "SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function

Changes by ppperry : -- title: "SystemError: SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function -> "SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function ___ Python tracker

[issue30626] "SystemError: returned NULL without setting an error" from open function

Changes by ppperry : -- type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30626> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue1402289] Allow mappings as globals (was: Fix dictionary subclass ...)

ppperry added the comment: See also issue32615 -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue1402289> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue32615] Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass

New submission from ppperry : Take the following code: import builtins class K(dict): def __getitem__(self, k): if k not in builtins.__dict__: print("get %s" % k) return dict.__getitem__(self, k) def _

[issue32615] Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass

Change by ppperry : -- type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32615> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue32615] Inconsistent behavior if globals is a dict subclass

ppperry added the comment: Uh, I'm not undertsanding the relevance of whether the code is run at module-level or not. It can't possibly be a feature that * some code * uses the overrides and *other code* doesn't. -- ___ Python

[issue32621] Problem of consistency in collection.abc documentation

Change by ppperry : -- title: Problem of consistence in collection.abc documentation -> Problem of consistency in collection.abc documentation ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue17852] Built-in module _io can lose data from buffered files in reference cycles

Change by ppperry : -- title: Built-in module _io can lose data from buffered files at exit -> Built-in module _io can lose data from buffered files in reference cycles ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue14010] deeply nested itertools objects segfault

Change by ppperry : -- title: deeply nested filter segfaults -> deeply nested itertools objects segfault ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue28685] Optimizing list.sort() by performing safety checks in advance

ppperry added the comment: ... and I'm still trying to come up with even more pathological mutating cases -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/is

[issue8525] Display exceptions' subclasses in help()

Change by ppperry : -- title: Display exception's subclasses in help() -> Display exceptions' subclasses in help() ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.pyth

[issue32895] Make general function sum() use Numpy's sum when obviously possible

Change by ppperry : -- components: +Library (Lib) -2to3 (2.x to 3.x conversion tool) ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32895> ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue32895] Make general function sum() use Numpy's sum when obviously possible

Change by ppperry : -- type: enhancement -> performance ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32895> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue32895] Make general function sum() use Numpy's sum when obviously possible

Change by ppperry : -- type: performance -> enhancement ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32895> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue32900] Teach pdb to step through asyncio et al.

ppperry added the comment: This feature already exists and doesn't need to be reimplemented; use `pdb.Pdb(skip={"trio", "contextlib", ...}).run(...)`, and in any case should be disableable. I don't use asyncio, but happen to have a habit of running pdb throu

[issue32900] Teach pdb to step through asyncio et al.

ppperry added the comment: Just to be clear, I'm not opposing having the default value for `skip` be something other than the empty set, but it should be overridable, and the default should include some other things this patch omits, like `importlib._bootstrap(_ext

[issue32900] Teach pdb to step through asyncio et al.

Change by ppperry : -- versions: +Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32900> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32911] Doc strings no longer stored in body of AST

Change by ppperry : -- title: Doc strings omitted from AST -> Doc strings no longer stored in body of AST ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue32926] Add public TestCase method/property to get result of current test

Change by ppperry : -- versions: +Python 3.8 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32926> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32926] Add public TestCase method/property to get result of current test

Change by ppperry : -- components: +Library (Lib) ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue32926> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue30953] Fatal python error when jumping into except clause

ppperry added the comment: ... with a bad error message, because there are no finally blocks in the code -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue30

[issue33093] Fatal error on SSL transport

Change by ppperry : -- type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33093> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue33120] infinite loop in inspect.unwrap(unittest.mock.call)

ppperry added the comment: This is a dupe of https://bugs.python.org/issue25532 -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33120> ___ ___

[issue31925] test_socket creates too many locks

Change by ppperry : -- title: test_socket creates too much locks -> test_socket creates too many locks ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue32140] IDLE debugger fails with non-trivial __new__ super call

ppperry added the comment: Simplified reproducer for same bug without any imports: class BadRepr: def __repr__(self): 1/0 def broken(): x=BadRepr() x=x #filler line for debugger In this case, the problematic BadRepr object in the "broken" function

[issue33460] "..." is used to confusingly indicate many different things in chapter 3

Change by ppperry : -- title: ... used to indicate many different things in chapter 3, some are confusing -> "..." is used to confusingly indicate many different things in chapter 3 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.pytho

[issue29199] test_regrtest fails if PCBuild directory doesn't exist

ppperry added the comment: This issue seems to have been fixed in 3.7 -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.or

[issue29199] test_regrtest fails if PCBuild directory doesn't exist

ppperry added the comment: To be precise, fixed as part of issue33352 -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue29199> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue33120] infinite loop in inspect.unwrap(unittest.mock.call)

Change by ppperry : -- type: crash -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue33120> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue34127] Gramatically incorrect error message for some descriptor calls with wrong number of arguments

New submission from ppperry : `{}.get()` Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in TypeError: get expected at least 1 arguments, got 0 Shouldn't that be "TypeError: get expected at least 1 argument, got 0" instead? -- components: Interpreter C

[issue34126] Profiling certain invalid calls crash Python

Change by ppperry : -- type: -> crash ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34126> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscrib

[issue34128] Do not block threads when pickle/unpickle

ppperry added the comment: um, something doesn't make sense about this. the python implementation of pickle never released the GIL (it can't, by definition -- it's written in python). The C implementation releasing the GIL wouldn't make sense, as the pickle api involv

[issue34126] Profiling certain invalid calls crashes Python

Change by ppperry : -- title: Profiling certain invalid calls crash Python -> Profiling certain invalid calls crashes Python ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue34128] Release GIL periodically in _pickle module

Change by ppperry : -- components: +Library (Lib) title: Do not block threads when pickle/unpickle -> Release GIL periodically in _pickle module ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue34128] Release GIL periodically in _pickle module

Change by ppperry : -- nosy: -ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34128> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34127] Gramatically incorrect error message for some calls with wrong number of arguments

ppperry added the comment: Another test case: >> classmethod() Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 2, in check TypeError: classmethod expected 1 arguments, got 0 -- title: Gramatically incorrect error message for some descriptor calls with wrong num

[issue21600] mock.patch.stopall doesn't work with patch.dict

Change by ppperry : -- title: mock.patch.stopall doesn't work with patch.dict to sys.modules -> mock.patch.stopall doesn't work with patch.dict ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.pytho

[issue34188] Allow dict choices to "transform" values in argpagse

Change by ppperry : -- title: Use dicts to "transform" argparse arguments to values -> Allow dict choices to "transform" values in argpagse ___ Python tracker <https://

[issue34193] Fix pluralization in TypeError messages in getargs.c

Change by ppperry : -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34193> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue34266] Bad behavior with "restart \" in pdb

New submission from ppperry : (Pdb) restart \ Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 1667, in main pdb._runscript(mainpyfile) File "C:\Program Files\Python36\lib\pdb.py", line 1548, in _runscript self.run(statement

[issue34266] Bad behavior with "restart \" in pdb

ppperry added the comment: Just to be clear, even though the traceback is python 3.6, the same bug occurs in 3.7 with an identical traceback except for some changes in line number -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34

[issue34266] Bad behavior with "restart \" or "restart "" in pdb

ppperry added the comment: `restart "` also crashes with the same tb -- title: Bad behavior with "restart \" in pdb -> Bad behavior with "restart \" or "restart "" in pdb ___ Python t

[issue34266] Bad behavior with "restart \" or "restart "" in pdb

ppperry added the comment: Both of those work and don't produce an error -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34266> ___ ___ Python-bugs-l

[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on some sys objects

New submission from ppperry : > type(sys.flags).__new__(type(sys.flags)) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in type(sys.flags).__new__(type(sys.flags)) TypeError: tuple.__new__(sys.flags) is not safe, use sys.flags.__new__() Ignoring the confusion cause

[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on some sys objects

ppperry added the comment: Your PR is not an improvement: 1. In this case, this will produce the error "tuple.__new__(sys.flags) is not safe". But I didn't call "tuple.__new__", I called sys.flags.__new__, and type(X).__new__(type(X)) should always be safe 2. The ch

[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on non-instaniable object

ppperry added the comment: Same thing happens for other objects, like `type(sys._getframe(0)).__new__(type(sys._getframe_))`, and presumably any object that one cannot instantiate by calling -- title: Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on some sys objects

[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on non-instaniable objects

ppperry added the comment: The error I'm expecting here is "cannot create sys.flags objects". Anything else violates the fact that type(*args) is sugar for: result = type.__new__(type, *args) if isinstance(result, type): result.__init__(*args) ("type" in the ab

[issue34284] Nonsensical exception message when calling `__new__` on non-instaniable objects

ppperry added the comment: Thus, I think the bug is that "type(sys.flags).__new__" is an alias for "tuple.__new__" and is not in the code for __new__ calls that your PR touches. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bug

[issue29502] Should PyObject_Call() call the profiler on C functions, use C_TRACE() macro?

ppperry added the comment: issue30990 is related -- nosy: +ppperry ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue29502> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue34279] RFC: issue a warning in regrtest when no tests have been executed?

Change by ppperry : -- title: RFC: issue a warning in regrtest when no test have been executed? -> RFC: issue a warning in regrtest when no tests have been executed? ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issu

[issue31710] setup.py: _ctypes won't get built when system ffi is only in $PREFIX

Change by ppperry : -- title: setup.py: _ctypes won't getbuilt when system ffi is only in $PREFIX -> setup.py: _ctypes won't get built when system ffi is only in $PREFIX ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.pytho

[issue34327] test_subprocess fails

Change by ppperry : -- components: +Tests -Build title: CPython make test crash -> test_subprocess fails type: crash -> behavior ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/i

[issue34331] Incorrectly pluralized abstract class error message

New submission from ppperry : >>> class abstract(abc.ABC): ... @abc.abstractmethod ... def meth(): ... pass ... >>> x() Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in TypeError: Can't instantiate abstract class x with abstract met

[issue34331] Incorrectly pluralized abstract class error message

ppperry added the comment: No, this isn't causing me an actual problem, however the related issue34127 was accepted, and this one should be no harder to fix. -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/is

  1   2   3   >