[issue1062] nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound
Martin Panter added the comment: The suggested subclass might have to call the default bind((, 0)) before running certain other operations, including connect(), send[to](), recv[from](), since these operations are meant to automatically bind if necessary. -- nosy: +vadmium ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1062] nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound
maniram maniram maniandra...@gmail.com added the comment: perhaps you can subclass socket.socket and make a function wrapper around bind and connect that sets a variable if called like: class sock(socket.socket): def bind(self,*args): self.is_bound = True -- nosy: +maniram.maniram ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1062] nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound
maniram maniram maniandra...@gmail.com added the comment: oops should be class sock(socket.socket): _bind = socket.socket.bind def bind(self,*args): self.is_bound = True self._bind(self,*args) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1062] nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- stage: - unit test needed versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1062] nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound
Changes by vila: -- nosy: +vila __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1062] nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound
Bill Janssen added the comment: What happened to my issue metadata? -- assignee: - janssen priority: - low title: None - nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound type: - rfe versions: +Python 2.6, Python 3.0 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1062] nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Given that the underlying platform has no support for that, it will be difficult to implement correctly across all systems. -- nosy: +loewis __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1062] nice to have a way to tell if a socket is bound
Bill Janssen added the comment: Indeed. Calls for some design chops. Again, it's a question of what the socket.socket class really is. Bill On 8/30/07, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Given that the underlying platform has no support for that, it will be difficult to implement correctly across all systems. -- nosy: +loewis __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 __ __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1062 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
