[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Changes by Yury Selivanov yselivanov...@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Changes by Claudiu.Popa pcmantic...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Claudiu.Popa ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Changes by Tom Wardill t...@howrandom.net: -- versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- stage: needs patch - patch review type: behavior - feature request ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment: Thanks for the patch Andreas. On a quick read through it looks good. I'll do a proper review shortly. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Andreas Stührk andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de added the comment: See issue #11813 for the module problem. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: Would it respect __dir__? -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk added the comment: No. It would return all members accessible to getattr_static (which is completely unrelated to what __dir__ may or may not return). Also calling __dir__ would mean code execution, and the point of these functions is to avoid this where possible. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Changes by Daniel Urban urban.dani...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +durban ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Andreas Stührk andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de added the comment: A first patch, misses any documentation changes. While working on it, I realised that modules technically shadow the __dict__ attribute (because modules use tp_dictoffset, hence module have a __dict__ member that points to the instance dict). I updated `_shadowed_dict()` so that it now disregards member descriptors as shadowing (as they will never trigger any code execution), but theoretically, the members can be any object (not just dicts), so I have to think a bit more about that case (as a custom object still can trigger code execution). Also, `dir_static()` behaves slightly different from `dir()` (e.g. `dir()` raises a `TypeError` if the module's __dict__ attribute isn't a dictionary, which is kind of impossible for `dir_static` as it doesn't even try to acccess `__dict__` if it is shadowed), but IMHO such edge-cases are expected to behave differently for a static version and hence we don't care at all about that. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21591/issue11770.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
Changes by Andreas Stührk andy-pyt...@hammerhartes.de: -- nosy: +Trundle ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11770] inspect.dir_static
New submission from Michael Foord mich...@voidspace.org.uk: A version of dir that returns all the members that can be seen by getattr_static. -- assignee: michael.foord components: Library (Lib) messages: 133017 nosy: michael.foord priority: low severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: inspect.dir_static type: behavior versions: Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11770 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
