Irit Katriel added the comment:
This is still unresolved. For instance, this says 3.7 is in development:
https://docs.python.org/release/3.6.2/
--
nosy: +iritkatriel
versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
'All Releases' rather than 'Everything else' is both more accurate and to me,
more graceful.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13122
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi all, how can we fix it? or better, should we fix it? From a user POV, it is
a weird to see 3.1 doc referring to 3.2 doc as in development then clicking
on that link, being redirect to 3.3a0 doc and see there that 3.2 is stable
(with no
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
http://docs.python.org/release/2.6.7/
has the same problem that the 3.x 'in development' version is called 3.2, while
there is no link to current stable 3.2.2 except indirectly by going to 'old
versions' (which perhaps should be 'other
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Nobody said 3.2 was not stable...
Well, the sidebar says it's in development while 2.7 is stable :)
--
nosy: +pitrou
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13122
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Well, actually I do have an idea. When 3.3 comes out, I think docs.python.org
should point to that, and another url should point to the most recent 2.7.x
release. The url for all versions is already stable. Then the sidebar could
have entries
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
My specific suggestion is that the sidebar be time-independent (for at least a
decade, until Python 4 ;-) and say
Docs for other versions
Current Python 3
Current Python 2
In development
Everything else
with stable links for each.
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Sounds good.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13122
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
To make my idea work both now and after we switch docs.python.org, that url
should not be used as either of the first two links. Rather there should be a
docs.python.org/py2k (or whatever) that is the permanent 'latest Python 2
release' docs
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
Nobody said 3.2 was not stable...
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13122
___
___
New submission from Sven Marnach s...@marnach.net:
The sidebar on http://docs.python.org/release/3.1.3/ names 3.2 as the
development version of Python, while the link points to 3.3. The sidebar on
http://docs.python.org/py3k/ links to 3.1 as the stable version -- obviously
a relict from the
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13122
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:
AFAIK the doc for 3.1 is not rebuilt anymore, so even if it's fixed, the change
won't have any visible effect -- unless someone manually triggers a rebuild.
Regarding the 3.1 link on the py3k page: I think 'stable' still applies, even
if
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
I disagree about 3.2 not being 'stable'. With more bugs fixes, it should be
more stable. People should be encouraged to download 3.2. 2.7 came out 8 months
before, and that should be updated (and again when 3.3 comes out).
--
nosy:
14 matches
Mail list logo
