[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-05-10 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 4b3238923b01 by Raymond Hettinger in branch 'default': Issue #16694: Add source code link for operator.py http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4b3238923b01 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-20 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 97834382c6cc by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Issue #16694: Add a pure Python implementation of the operator module. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/97834382c6cc -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-20 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: I've now commited the latest patch. Thank you very much, Zachary! -- resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-17 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: length_hint() looks ok as well. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-16 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I reviewed the attrgetter(), mathodgetter(), and itemgetter() code in py_operator.v12.diff. The looks clean and correct. -- assignee: rhettinger - ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-16 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Now we can remove all __func__s from _operator.c. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-16 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Thank you for the review, Raymond. Since Serhiy agrees that the _operator __func__s are unnecessary, here's a v13 that removes them. Again, I'm not a native C speaker, so these new changes in _operator.c deserve a bit of extra scrutiny. Everything builds and

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Here's another new version of the patch, addressing Ezio's review comments and a few things I found after giving operator.py a closer look myself. Things changed in operator.py in this version: - all ``__func__ = func`` assignments are moved to the end, after

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -Arfrever, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, jcea, meador.inge, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28327/operator.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28328/py_operator.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28374/py_operator.v3.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28388/py_operator.v5.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28383/py_operator.v4.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28522/py_operator.v7.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28524/py_operator.v8.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28532/py_operator.v9.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever, brett.cannon, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, jcea, meador.inge, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: A change that I mentioned in a Rietveld comment on v10, but not in my last message: __all__ in operator.py no longer includes all of the __func__s, as currently doing from operator import * does not import all of the __func__s. --

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I think Antoine is more appropriate for committing this patch. I waited so long with this because I do not dare to take responsibility for themselves (it's almost like adding a new module). -- assignee: serhiy.storchaka -

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I would like to spend some time with this before it goes forward (especially the attrgetter, itemgetter, methodgetter group). Right now, it looks like a nice effort but I don't see how it makes Python any better for adding it. The odds are that this code

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: Raymond: it's not for the benefit of CPython. -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: [David] Raymond: it's not for the benefit of CPython. IIRC, all the other implementations of Python already have this code passing tests, so it isn't really for their benefit either. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-15 Thread Alex Gaynor
Alex Gaynor added the comment: If a pure python operator module were a part of the stdlib, we (PyPy) would probably delete most (if not all) of our own operator module. -- nosy: +alex ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-14 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Thank you! One optional thing, the code churn could be minimized in test_operator.py by writing operator = self.module at the beginning of each test method. Otherwise, looks good to me. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Zachary, I suppose Modules/_operator.c is a rename of Modules/operator.c. Could you generate your patch using hg diff --git so that history isn't lost here? See also http://docs.python.org/devguide/committing.html#minimal-configuration -- nosy:

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-04-13 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Zachary, I suppose Modules/_operator.c is a rename of Modules/operator.c. Could you generate your patch using hg diff --git so that history isn't lost here? Of course; I thought I already had, but apparently I messed that up a bit. v11 is in the proper

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-01-29 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Since the older Windows project files were removed, v10 removes the patches to them. Everything else still applies cleanly. Also, in the spirit of what Brett said in 16651 about not re-implementing blindly, I did just look up what Jython, IronPython, and PyPy

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-01-02 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: v8 LGTM (except some trailing whitespaces). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___ ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-01-02 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Note to self: learn to run patchcheck.py before posting. Whitespace issues fixed in v9. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28532/py_operator.v9.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-01-02 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: If no one objects I will commit this next week. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___ ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-01-01 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Sorry, I misunderstood Éric's suggestions regarding the tests; v6 is useless. v7 forthcoming. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-01-01 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28391/py_operator.v6.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-01-01 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Ok, I believe the attached v7 properly addresses Éric's concerns about test discovery, and has no other changes unrelated to that compared to v5. Thank you very much to Ezio for directing me towards the json tests for an example to work from. -- nosy:

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2013-01-01 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28524/py_operator.v8.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-29 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___ ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-28 Thread Meador Inge
Changes by Meador Inge mead...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +meador.inge ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-22 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I don't understand what is difference between v5 and v6. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: About length_hint(): I were mean something like (even explicit getattr() not needed): try: hint = type(obj).__length_hint__ except AttributeError: return default try: val = hint(obj) except TypeError: return default ... This is a little

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Here's another new version. Changes include: - Address Serhiy's Rietveld comments - Fix length_hint() the way it was meant to be fixed last time. - Remove __getitem__ check on 'b' in concat and iconcat. More notes on this below. - Fix methodcaller as Serhiy

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Good work, Zachary. I have no more nitpicks for you. ;) LGTM. -- stage: patch review - commit review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: One comment to a committer. Don't forget to run `hg rename Modules/operator.c Modules/_operator.c` before applying the patch. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Nits are no fun; thank you for picking them, Serhiy ;) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: FYI Mercurial can use the extended diff format invented by git, which supports renames, changes to file permissions, etc. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: The base test class should not inherit from TestCase: it will be picked up by test discovery and then will break, as self.module will be None. Typical usage: class OperatorTestsMixin: module = None class COperatorTests(OperatorTestsMixin,

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-21 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Did not know that about test discovery, thank you Éric. Fixed in v6. A few other test modules may need the same fix; I based my changes to Lib/test/test_operator.py on Lib/test/test_heapq.py which has the same issue. I'll open a new report for it and any

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-20 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Sorry, I forgot push a Publish All My Drafts button. Please consider other my comments to first patch. I also have added new comments about length_hint(). Your implementation of attrgetter() looks good. One possible disadvantage of pure functional approach

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-20 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Here's v4, addressing Serhiy's comments on Reitveld. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28383/py_operator.v4.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-19 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Sorry to have disappeared on this, other things took priority... Thank you for the comments, Serhiy. v2 of the patch renames Modules/operator.c to Modules/_operator.c, and changes that name every place I could find it. I also tried to tidy up some of the error

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-19 Thread Zachary Ware
Zachary Ware added the comment: Considering what a huge headache it was to get my own patch to apply at home on Linux rather than at work on Windows, here's a new version of the patch that straightens out the line ending nightmare present in v2. No other changes made. -- Added file:

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-19 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file28373/py_operator.v2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-17 Thread Jesús Cea Avión
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es: -- nosy: +jcea ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-16 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- stage: - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___ ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-16 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Here is a functional (and more effective) equivalent of attrgetter: def attrgetter(attr, *attrs): Return a callable object that fetches the given attribute(s) from its operand. After f=attrgetter('name'), the call f(r) returns r.name. After

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-16 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Perhaps Modules/operator.c should be renamed to Modules/_operator.c. Also note, that error messages in Python an C implementations sometimes differ. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-16 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-15 Thread Zachary Ware
New submission from Zachary Ware: (Brett, I've made you nosy due to the relation to Issue16651.) Here is a pure Python implementation of the operator module, or at least a first draft thereof :). I'm attaching the module itself, as well as a patch to integrate it. Any and all review is

[issue16694] Add pure Python operator module

2012-12-15 Thread Zachary Ware
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file28328/py_operator.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue16694 ___