[issue17417] Documentation Modification Suggestion: os.walk, fwalk

2013-03-16 Thread Gurmeet Singh
Gurmeet Singh added the comment: I am sorry to reopen this issue, if you do not like this comment, then I will reopen issues again. I am not saying to change the convention of the documentation - I just requested you to say something that would indicate that it is function that gives result

[issue17417] Documentation Modification Suggestion: os.walk, fwalk

2013-03-16 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Reopening issues closed by a developer is worse than just 'bugging'. It wastes time, distracts from real problems, and if repeated can get your tracker account closed. Don't do it again. I gave you a suggestion: post on python-list where you can get responses

[issue17417] Documentation Modification Suggestion: os.walk, fwalk

2013-03-15 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Our standard is to start function doc entries with verbs. In any case, it is irrelevant whether os.walk is a generator function or iterator class. Which is to say, it is not part of the language definition that the object returned by os.walk() is specifically

[issue17417] Documentation Modification Suggestion: os.walk, fwalk

2013-03-14 Thread Gurmeet Singh
New submission from Gurmeet Singh: Source page: http://docs.python.org/3/library/os.html Entry: os.walk(...), os.fwalk() These functions seems to be a generator functions. An expert like yourself may have no trouble to make this out. But for novice (or for people out of touch) like myself