Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset a0d8ae880ae6 by Brett Cannon in branch '3.3':
Issue #18055: Move to importlib from imp for IDLE.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a0d8ae880ae6
New changeset 3a3ec484ce95 by Brett Cannon in branch 'default':
merge w/ 3.3 for issue #18055
Brett Cannon added the comment:
Thanks for the help everyone!
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: commit review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18055
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org:
--
assignee: - brett.cannon
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18055
___
___
New submission from Brett Cannon:
As part of issue #14797 I'm trying to remove all uses of
imp.find_module/load_module since the API is so bad in the face of importers.
See the attached patch to replace the one use in IDLE. It should actually be
more accepting of alternative importers than
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +kbk, roger.serwy, terry.reedy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18055
___
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
(Roger, please see Bretts opening message.)
Brett, thanks for asking. We prefer to keep active codebases in sync as much as
possible. Since new import stuff is not in 2.7, we will have to skip that.
In EditorWindow.py, the patch deletes the _find_module
Brett Cannon added the comment:
If you would prefer to keep using imp in IDLE to make management across
versions easier I'm fine with that, just understand my goal is to deprecate imp
in Python 3.4 (but won't remove it until Python 4 so people can write Python
2/3 compatible code, much like
Roger Serwy added the comment:
@Brett, I agree that IDLE should not be using deprecated modules. I don't know
all the ins and outs of the import machinery of Python, so I'll defer to your
expertise in that area. :-)
@Terry, I have never used this IDLE feature before, so I don't know all it's
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Brett, you misunderstood somethings. I want to apply now to 3.3 and 3.4. This
is the right time now that 3.2 final maintenance is out. (In any case, we are
no longer patching it. 2.7 gets improvements on a 'reasonable best effort'
basis.) It is also clearer
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Roger, sorry, I did not read your message completely. When I open from the
console intepreter, I also get the traceback; same behavior.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18055
10 matches
Mail list logo
