Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
I don't think this should be done. Python is primarily a language with a
standard library, not a command-line development toolkit. We should avoid
mission creep.
There are plenty of mature, robust, full-featured solutions already available.
For
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I am going to agree with starting on PyPI if indeed there is not something
there now.
--
resolution: - rejected
stage: needs patch - resolved
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
I would like a simple patcher for three reasons.
1. hg, at least as I see it exposed through tortoisehg workbenck, will not
apply a patch if there is already an uncommitted change. (But perhaps someone
will tell me that there is a 'do it anyway' option.)
Changes by Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
nosy: -BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2057
___
___
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Hi Marco, thanks for your interest in improving Python. Do you want to propose
a patch for this request? If so, guidelines and help are found in the devguide.
(For the other bug, please read the discussion there to see why 2.7 is not
Marco Scataglini atlant...@gmx.com added the comment:
I agree with Anatoly that it should be an easy way to create and apply Unified
Diff Patches within Python. Also issue 2142 should get fixed, as proposed, but
also include the fix at least on 2.7 not only on 3.x
--
nosy: +marco
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
A productive thing to do would be to ask feedback on python-ideas for this new
feature.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2057
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
For this to move forward, a patch or link to Mercurial repo would be required.
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
stage: test needed - needs patch
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
For this to move forward, PSF should accelerate work on new sane Contributor's
Agreements or join Harmony (http://www.harmonyagreements.org/)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
Anatoly,
Even if I remove all sarcasm from your previous answer, I don't see what it
brings to the current issue.
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
It is not sarcasm, but prerequisite. I do not sign papers I don't understand or
papers that doesn't make any sense (and thus are free to any interpretation). I
could sign current CLA right away, but I prefer not to do this until
Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
Is this really needed? TortoiseSVN is a cracking bit of kit, and I'm hoping
that in the future TortoiseHG is as good if not better.
--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
___
Python tracker
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Unified diffs is the preferred type on this tracker as
http://www.python.org/dev/patches/ describes. I also sure that they constitute
more than 90% of patches attached here. If you have access to tracker
attachments - you can test this.
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Given that difflib produces unified diffs (among 3 others) and that diff.py is
a thin command-line wrapper that provides access to all 4 formats (with no
default), I consider those two files 'ready'. So I presume you are referring to
your
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Terry J. Reedy rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Given that difflib produces unified diffs (among 3 others) and that diff.py
is a thin command-line wrapper that provides access to all 4 formats (with no
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
I would like to see this more easily available, perhaps in /Scripts.
Are unified diffs the type usually posted to the tracker?
I am not sure what you meant by ' diff/patch lib is not.'
--
nosy: +terry.reedy
stage: - unit test needed
Changes by Alexander Stanley l...@swixel.net:
--
nosy: +swixel
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2057
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by Todd Whiteman twhit...@yahoo.com.au:
--
nosy: +twhitema
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2057
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Stefan van der Walt ste...@sun.ac.za:
--
nosy: +stefanv
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2057
___
___
Python-bugs-list
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Tool is ready. diff/patch lib is not. http://code.google.com/p/python-patch/
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2057
Changes by Christian Heimes:
--
priority: - low
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2057
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
New submission from anatoly techtonik:
difflib alone and bundled Tools\Scripts\diff.py utility are both very
useful, esp. on windows platforms where standard unix diffutils are
absent. However, python difflib still doesn't have a patch counterpart
to apply at least unified diff format.
22 matches
Mail list logo
