[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: Thanks for the review. I committed my patch in the hope that it makes it into 3.5.2, but if people want to suggest further improvements etc that is okay. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset a7e04b4e51b2 by Martin Panter in branch '3.5': Issue #24136: Document generalized unpacking, PEP 448 https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a7e04b4e51b2 New changeset 4cf3389cd8e6 by Martin Panter in branch 'default': Issue #24136: Merge unpacking doc

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Jelle Zijlstra added the comment: Thanks for writing a better patch. The patch looks good to me and it builds correctly. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: Here is a new patch that also updates the documentation for list etc displays as well as function calls. Let me know what you think. The 3.5 What’s New notes were written separately; Neil’s patch was never applied. But I have rescued his update for

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- nosy: -pitrou ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: Thanks for helping with this Jelle. The documentation of unpacking sequences vs iterables was adjusted in 3.6 as part of Issue 23275. I guess part of revision 8a0754fed986 should be extracted to 3.5 as well. Looking at the function call syntax, positional and

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Jelle Zijlstra added the comment: This updates reference_calls_syntax_update.diff. The previous patch's grammard had a mistake; it was missing commas between arguments. I believe all other patches in this diff are now obsolete. -- Added file:

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Jelle Zijlstra added the comment: Here's what I found reviewing what needs to be done here: - Neil's What's New patch apparently made it into the 3.5 release notes. - moigagoo's two patches haven't been committed. The text of both looks ok to me, but the patches don't apply cleanly. Other

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Zachary Ware : -- hgrepos: -336 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Brett Cannon : -- nosy: -brett.cannon ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Berker Peksag : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg263250 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Berker Peksag added the comment: supriyanto maftuh,st, please don't play with tracker items. -- components: -Benchmarks, Build, IO, Unicode, Windows, XML, email versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

supriyanto maftuh,st added the comment: Hy -- components: +Benchmarks, Build, IO, Unicode, Windows, XML, email hgrepos: +336 nosy: +barry, brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, haypo, paul.moore, pitrou, r.david.murray, steve.dower, supriyanto maftuh, supriyanto maftuh,st, tim.golden, zach.ware

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: It is now 10 months and 2 releases since the rather large code patch. Documenting the extensive changes does not seem easy to me ;-). Certainly, a beginner needs feedback. -- nosy: +terry.reedy ___ Python tracker

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +berker.peksag stage: needs patch - patch review versions: +Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24136 ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Changes by Konstantin Molchanov moiga...@live.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39919/replace_sequence_with_iterable.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24136 ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Konstantin Molchanov added the comment: I've updated the Calls syntax reference in reference/expressions and the assignment object description in reference/simple_stmts. Please tell me if I'm generally doing OK. If I'm not, please guide me to the right direction. -- Added file:

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Neil Girdhar added the comment: Copied from closed issue 24240: Since Grammar/Grammar relies on semantic postprocessing in ast.c, it would be nice to have an update of the (human readable) Grammar in the language reference docs. -- ___ Python

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: FWIW, I still emails from the tracker, even the ones with my own comments and changes. All I can suggest is check the address you have set, check for spam, etc. I don’t @mentioning will do anything here. But as long as the person is in the nosy list they

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Konstantin Molchanov added the comment: @vadmium thanks for the assistance! I'll kick off with the reference then. P.S. Am I the only one who doesn't receive any emails from the tracker? I never got the registration link or a follow-up notification from this issue. Am I missing something?

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Neil Girdhar added the comment: I don't receive emails from the tracker anymore either and I have no idea why that is. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24136 ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448: unpacking generalization

Martin Panter added the comment: Yes I think it is expected and documented that the leftovers are turned into a list. See https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/simple_stmts.html#index-6. I originally had similar confusion, expectating the starred target to become a tuple, because people often

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Neil Girdhar added the comment: Simplified functools.partial documentation. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39561/wn2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24136 ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Changes by Neil Girdhar mistersh...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39562/wn2.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24136 ___

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Neil Girdhar added the comment: Just updated the what's new. Also, thank you for adding my name to Misc/Acks. Should we also add Joshua Landau's name? He helped me quite a bit with the implementation, and he wrote the PEP. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +neil.g Added file:

[issue24136] document PEP 448

Changes by Martin Panter vadmium...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +vadmium ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24136 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue24136] document PEP 448

New submission from Benjamin Peterson: PEP 448 has been implemented (#2292), but the documentation hasn't been updated. Updating the documentation will improve looking through Doc/reference/* and making sure the documentation (and grammar) for calls and assignments is updated for PEP 448's