[issue24523] coroutine asyncio.wait() does not preserve order of elements

2015-11-29 Thread Марк Коренберг
Марк Коренберг added the comment: Yes this is not a bug. Use asyncio.gather(), it preserves order of elements :) -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue24523] coroutine asyncio.wait() does not preserve order of elements

2015-06-28 Thread Марк Коренберг
New submission from Марк Коренберг: If I pass an list of futures/coroutines as (done, _) = asyncio.wait([...]), order of elements in `done` does NOT match order of elements in `wait`'s argument. This is not documented, and I don't know if that is a bug or not. Also, documentation say: Wait

[issue24523] coroutine asyncio.wait() does not preserve order of elements

2015-06-28 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: The docs say that it returns two *sets* and Python's set datatype is unordered. So that's all you need to know. I don't think there's anything else needed in the docs. -- resolution: - not a bug status: open - closed