[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

Change by Yury Selivanov : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

Yury Selivanov added the comment: New changeset 762b9571c9c8c6b036f1bf90140a1d030b3f9a01 by Yury Selivanov (Dong-hee Na) in branch 'master': bpo-32018: Fix inspect.signature repr to follow PEP 8 (#4408)

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

Dong-hee Na added the comment: I've submitted a patch. :) -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- nosy: +corona10 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

Change by Dong-hee Na : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +4357 stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

R. David Murray added the comment: Agreed. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Those people who read and write annotations regularly are all using the convention that was added to PEP 8, so let's make inspect follow that lead rather than argue about it here. :-) -- nosy: +gvanrossum

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

Change by Eric V. Smith : -- nosy: +eric.smith ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

R. David Murray added the comment: FWIW, I find the version without the spaces to be more readable (but I don't find annotations to be readable in general, so my opinion may not be worth much :) -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___

[issue32018] inspect.signature does not respect PEP 8

New submission from Ivan Levkivskyi : The string representation of a function signature with annotations is currently like this: >>> def __init__(self, x: int = 1, y: int = 2) -> None: pass ... >>> import inspect >>> str(inspect.signature(__init__)) '(self, x:str=1,