[issue38632] setup.py sdist should honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2021-02-03 Thread Steve Dower
Steve Dower added the comment: Distutils is now deprecated (see PEP 632) and all tagged issues are being closed. From now until removal, only release blocking issues will be considered for distutils. If this issue does not relate to distutils, please remove the component and reopen it. If

[issue38632] setup.py sdist should honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2020-05-23 Thread Matthias Bussonnier
Matthias Bussonnier added the comment: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20331 is a first step toward this. See comments in there, I would love some reviews. If that gets im I'll be happy to send further refactor to make the compression step also respect SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. For

[issue38632] setup.py sdist should honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2020-05-23 Thread Matthias Bussonnier
Change by Matthias Bussonnier : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +19599 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/20331 ___ Python tracker

[issue38632] setup.py sdist should honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2020-05-23 Thread Matthias Bussonnier
Change by Matthias Bussonnier : -- nosy: +mbussonn ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue38632] setup.py sdist should honor SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

2019-10-29 Thread Zack Weinberg
New submission from Zack Weinberg : Reproducibility has so far been concerned primarily with binary packages, but it's also desirable for source tarballs to be reproducible starting from a version-control checkout. This is particularly important for Python, where 'setup.py sdist' can run