[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-11 Thread Humberto Diogenes
Changes by Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10279/mailbox-replace_rfc822.patch Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-11 Thread Humberto Diogenes
Changes by Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10272/mailbox.py.patch2 Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-11 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I removed the old classes in 3k. There remains one usage of rfc822, as the default factory of Maildir. It's replaced by None in the patch here; is that safe to do? -- nosy: +georg.brandl Tracker

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-11 Thread Humberto Diogenes
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: rfc822 is replaced by None in the patch here; is that safe to do? Yes. That's what mailbox documentation says: Parameter factory is a callable object that accepts a file-like message representation [...] and returns a custom

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-11 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Removed the last rfc822 reference from 3k's mailbox.py in r63091. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-11 Thread Humberto Diogenes
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Georg, any special reason for not removing rfc822 references from test_mailbox? That section of the patch was not merged. Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-11 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Okay, removed that too in r63096. Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-10 Thread Humberto Diogenes
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: synx's patch wasn't applying cleanly and broke 2 maildir tests. I'm posting one with updated tests and documentation. Still need to get rid of rfc822 in test_mailbox, though. Question: mailbox.py has one section marked as classes from the

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-10 Thread A.M. Kuchling
A.M. Kuchling [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I think removing those old classes in 3.0 would be very sensible. Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-05-10 Thread Humberto Diogenes
Humberto Diogenes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I created issue 2814 with a patch to remove those old classes. Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2008-01-09 Thread A.M. Kuchling
Changes by A.M. Kuchling: -- assignee: barry - akuchling Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue756982 ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue756982] mailbox should use email not rfc822

2007-11-27 Thread synx
synx added the comment: I dunno if this is helpful, but in the 2.5 module, it parses mailboxes into rfc822 messages, but then expects them to be email.Message messages when unparsing them back to a mailbox. mbox2.add(mbox1.popitem()[1]) fails with rfc822 as the default factory. Since the factory