Changes by Ankur Ankan ankuran...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Ankur.Ankan
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue935117
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Éric Araujo added the comment:
With the advent of implicit namespace packages in 3.3, I don’t know if anything
in pkgutil will be done for this use case.
(BTW is it normal that pkgutil.extend_path is not at least doc-deprecated?)
--
nosy: +eric.araujo, eric.smith
Changes by Anthony Kong anthony.hw.k...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +Anthony.Kong
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue935117
___
___
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue935117
___
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue935117
___
___
Changes by Daniel Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +tarek
stage: - test needed
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.5, Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue935117
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Perhaps it's just me, but Fred's use case looks horrible.
If you have three packages named foo, Foo and foo, all of which
reachable through sys.path on a case-insensitive filesystem, I'm not
sure how to expect Python to make sense out of the
Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdr...@acm.org added the comment:
Antoine: I agree programmers shouldn't try to create situations like this.
Consider however an application assembled using a build tool like
zc.buildout, which installs each package into a separate installation
location (based on setuptools
Changes by Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdr...@acm.org:
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue935117
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
