ave unique LPAR/WPAR environments to keep the build
environments sterile - and use IPv6 for further isolation.
Question: has CPython ever been tested in an IPv6-only environment
(i.e., will IPv4 tests break automatically when the only IPv4 (if even
then) is 127.0.0.1.
Regards,
Michael
OpenPGP_s
#x27; issue with xlc (v13 and v16 in any case) and _decimal - there
is someone looking at that (i.e., I know who to ask for more help) can
be worked on now - now the seg fault is gone.
Michael
p.s. - I hope you all agree this is not a suitable message for
python-dev. imho - it is more about what
FYI: As I am on vacation and cannot research red flags - I am leaving
the aixtools-aix-power6 offline for the time being.
On 15/06/2020 18:59, build...@python.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder POWER6 AIX 3.8 while
> building python/cpython.
> Full details are availa
question, has been, and is: is a NEWS blurb needed?
I am trying to clear the noise. I am open to a better solution - if my "quick
fix" is not going to be good enough.
Regards,
Michael
On 01/06/2020 18:04, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 10:42 AM Michael Felt wrote:
>>
Hi.
As I have been re-working my servers I am not sure if the lack of
contact I have with the bot server is self-inflected, or is it down?
is all I see.
Michael
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list -- python-buildbots@python.org
To unsubscribe send an
far.
If my server was not so old (and slow) I would offer it's availability
for CI. In short, I do not discuss it (just wish I could).
Michael
> Victor
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list -- python-buildbots@python.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
lease switch them back on.
Sincerely,
Michael
On 3/9/2020 12:25 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Email notifications are disabled on:
>
> * PPC64 AIX because of https://bugs.python.org/issue36273
> * POWER6 AIX because of https://bugs.python.org/issue36752
>
> https://github.com/p
more timely.
e.g., 3+ days ago a change killed the AIX build process. The fix is
simple, but if I had not had time to check the web page yesterday
evening this would still be ongoing - with no notification whatsoever.
Many thanks for your assistance,
Mi
Re: your first question: the buildbot process does not push, and b) 3rd
party people/organizations do not have push authority, so your concern
is not not about buildbot - but github and who can push into it
(regardless of whether it is part of buildbot testing or not).
As to your second questi
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/10 was an AIX bot, but now I see
Builders <https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders>AMD64 Fedora
Rawhide 3.8 <https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/10>
And run #1 two hours ago?
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
On 14/11/2019 23:52, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le jeu. 31 oct. 2019 à 13:22, Michael a écrit :
>> On 30/10/2019 15:07, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>> If one or both AIX buildbot workers were modified to use GCC instead
>>> of XLC, I can consider to reenable email notificatio
issue atm.
Whatever changed, AIX does not seem to like it.
Michael
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list -- python-buildbots@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-buildbots-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-buildbots.python.org/
FYI: Changing my ISP setups, so there will be downtime as both my backup
and primary IP addresses are changing.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org/
Hi all,
Now that the PPC64-AIX bot is also "green" for master (and I hope real
soon for 3.8 and 3.7) I feel 'comfortable' with having me server in
PowerOff status while I am off on vacation.
Will be back soon!
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
Finally, got to this point that the tests are all passing on the bot - 3.X!!
p.s. - now that 3.8 is beta - Will there be a separate bot for 3.8 in
the near future?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Buildbots mailing lis
On 21/05/2019 12:35, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le mar. 21 mai 2019 à 12:32, Michael a écrit :
>> On 20/05/2019 22:50, Michael wrote:
>> Short part - re: one test seems to be a clear regression
>> (https://bugs.python.org/issue36816) - that I hit when building from
>> git
On 20/05/2019 22:50, Michael wrote:
Short part - re: one test seems to be a clear regression
(https://bugs.python.org/issue36816) - that I hit when building from
github manually.
Two tests - are regressions in both bots: test_asyncio test_threading
regards,
Michael
8 days
ago - see failure:
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/10/builds/2603 and "warning"
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/10/builds/2602
regards,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Bu
On 25/04/2019 15:51, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:11 AM Michael Felt wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Is there something missing from the AIX buildbots that there is no
>> record for the buildtime?
> I'm not sure what you mean. Looking at
> https://bu
).
Besides having a "yellow" exit color (warnings) - is this also
preventing the gccfarm AIX bot from showing as "successful" (in the graph)?
If there is something additional needed - please indicate what - if you
know.
Thanks,
Michael
> On 25-Mar-19 09:50, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 16:32, Michael a écrit :
>> Understood - and have, after I better understood the reluctance for any
>> AIX related patch - took, I think it was yours (Victor) advice - worry
>> about
On 12/03/2019 10:18, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le sam. 9 mars 2019 à 14:00, Michael a écrit :
>> I was actually think more of the backporting from master to 3.7 and 3.6.
>> It was made very clear to me well over a year ago that "nothing" would
>> be considered for
On 08/03/2019 15:20, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 10:44, Michael Felt a écrit :
>> I am fine with running only on the master branch - as I long gave up the
>> fight for back-porting. Hard enough to get people to look at master
>> (emote: speaking - so also
y on AIX 6.1 and
AIX 5.3.
In short, there are some code dependencies that show up when the
compiler is not gcc. They are very hard to find, sadly. I hope finding
them makes CPython more portable and stable. No other reason to pursue them.
Sincerely,
Michael
>
> Victor
>
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
On 05/03/2019 16:07, Victor Stinner wrote:
> My intent is also to clarify the difference between a "fully supported
> platform" and "best effort platform support":
> https://pythondev.readthedocs.io/platforms.html
>
> My intent is not to kick some platforms out of Python.
>
> What do you think?
I
Just a bit of a surprise - is it correct that the bb have not run for 2+
days?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
min)
running: test_multiprocessing_spawn (35 hour 9 min)
Best wishes for 2019 - Happy, Healthy and full of PR (better, bpo)
resolutions!
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots
or many of us the year-end holidays come quickly. I wish you
all the very best holidays and other year-ends activities.
Sincerely,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@py
k BOTH include files AND library availability. My bot system could
have been (should have been) using an "external" aka " system" expat
library.
Is it the intent to use a "system" expat - if one is found?
On 11/13/2018
On 11/13/2018 11:07 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
> As my system that does not any libexpat does not need this "help", I am
> going to guess that since configure finds the include files it builds
> pyexpat differently than when the include file is not available.
>
> I'll
On 11/12/2018 3:16 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2018, at 15:27, Michael wrote:
>> Anyway, my bot went from having 9 to 10 fails (and 10k lines of output)
>> to 20 fails and roughly 22k lines of test.
>>
>> The last "near normal FAIL" is:
>> htt
On 10/11/2018 23:34, Michael Felt (aixtools) wrote:
OK. I spent a bit of time looking at the results, and to my dismay -
there was a major shift in the number of errors that the AIX bot returns.
I spent about a month of real-time to find corrections to all the open
AIX tests - so that the build
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10 Nov 2018, at 21:29, Zachary Ware wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 12:48 PM David Bolen wrote:
>> If you look back on the worker there's probably some other build on the
>> same worker still technically running that's blocking the rest. It might
>> be old enoug
acquiring locks for 9 days!
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/8
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
pport.
Regards,
Michael
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
at weekend,
Michael aka aixtools
p.s. this is my personal system, in case that matters: a Power6
___
Python-Buildbots mailing list
Python-Buildbots@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
36 matches
Mail list logo
