On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 4:42 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I blindly assume that non of us is going to say "Give me bucks or I won't
> code any more". But our economy is going through a recession, everything is
> getting more expensive by the day. A constant income would allow s
> I'm just thinking that we have a good code review app and a good ticket
> system, maybe we just need to use the code review system more
Rietveld will already send reviews into the bug tracker, assuming you
make the bug tracker a reviewer, or otherwise a message recipient.
Regards,
Martin
__
Fredrik> I would still like to hear from someone who's used both
Fredrik> Rietveld and the older (and from what I can tell more widely
Fredrik> used) Review Board.
Good point. A bit to Python-focused in my note.
Skip
___
python-committers
>Jesse> Would it be possible / make sense to tie this more tightly to the
>Jesse> code review application guido put together?
>
> Drifting a bit far afield, but are we using Guido's tool (Rietveld)? If
> not, maybe the BDFL should put his BBDF (Big Benevolent Dictator's Foot)
> down and de
Jesse> Would it be possible / make sense to tie this more tightly to the
Jesse> code review application guido put together?
Drifting a bit far afield, but are we using Guido's tool (Rietveld)? If
not, maybe the BDFL should put his BBDF (Big Benevolent Dictator's Foot)
down and decree no
2008/8/15 A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Should we add a 'needsreview' or 'ready-for-review' keyword that could
> be marked on such bugs? People could check for it before diving into
> a bug, and the mythical reviewer could use it too.
*Maybe*. It'd be the fourth keyword there.
But I don'
On Aug 15, 2008, at 10:54 AM, "A.M. Kuchling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:48:49PM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote:
And, if you pick up that bug six month later, or three year later,
you
lose twenty minutes reading the whole discussion, and then realize
that neither yo
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:48:49PM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote:
> And, if you pick up that bug six month later, or three year later, you
> lose twenty minutes reading the whole discussion, and then realize
> that neither you have the expertise to get a decision, and skip to the
> next bug.
...
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 14, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
Let me take this opportunity to explicitly say that I'm not /
blaming/ anybody for this. I consider the problems we had with the
module an indication of a systemic, team-wi
Anthony Baxter wrote:
What would this professionalisation get us that we don't have now? As
far as I can see, the biggest hole at the moment (as always) is with
people to trawl the tracker and triage bug reports and patches.
It would get us one or some developers who can work 8+ hours a day, fi
10 matches
Mail list logo
