FWIW, I have a 2.6.1 installer here which I've tested on a few machines.
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:18 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>Skip> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
>>
>>Martin> Yes,
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:18 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Skip> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
>
>Martin> Yes, it's broken.
>
>Skip> Was it a G4 perhaps?
>
>Martin> I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
>
>Jesse> My 10.5 buildbot should
Skip> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
Martin> Yes, it's broken.
Skip> Was it a G4 perhaps?
Martin> I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
Jesse> My 10.5 buildbot should still be active at very least.
I was thinking that maybe it could se
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:01 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
>
> Yes, it's broken.
>
>> Was it a G4 perhaps?
>
> I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
My 10.5 buildbot should still be ac
> I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone?
Yes, it's broken.
> Was it a G4 perhaps?
I've now turned it off, so I can't find out anymore.
Regards,
Martin
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
http://mail.python.
Ronald> * An Intel Mac running 10.4.x
Brett> That requirement right there take me out for being able to to do
Brett> the binary.
Jesse> I could do binaries for 10.5 and forward. I've got a few macs at
Jesse> my disposal
I thought the PSF had a 10.4 XServe box. Is it gone? W
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 23:35, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:52, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>
> How
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 23:35, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:52, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 15:40, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
How does that sounds?
>>>
>>> Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 6, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:40, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
How does that sounds?
Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular
basis?
I haven't even looked seriously at 3.0 yet an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 5, 2008, at 6:40 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
How does that sounds?
Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular
basis?
Specifically, who is working on binaries for 3.0 and 2.6.1? Ronald?
(the 2.6.1 release page cla
On 6 Dec, 2008, at 0:40, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
How does that sounds?
Sounds good! Are we also going to produce OSX binaries on a regular
basis?
I haven't even looked seriously at 3.0 yet and therefore wouldn't be
the rigth person to build OSX binaries at the moment.
Specifically,
11 matches
Mail list logo
