Re: [python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn

2009-03-01 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> and that it takes forever > > Not sure about that - I *do* port my own changes, and while the merges > are quicker than a full recompile or running the test suite, they're > still far, far, slower than applying an equivalent patch or doing an svn > update. I meant that

Re: [python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn

2009-03-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 27, 2009, at 7:06 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: - Mercurial: IMO we can't go wrong with this. I've tried it a bit for small projects, and it's very easy to learn for a SVN user. I've talked to Bryan O'Sullivan, and I'm impressed by the customer

Re: [python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn

2009-03-01 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2009/3/1 Nick Coghlan : > Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> and that it takes forever > > Not sure about that - I *do* port my own changes, and while the merges > are quicker than a full recompile or running the test suite, they're > still far, far, slower than applying an equivalent patch or doing an svn

Re: [python-committers] Survey about DVCSs compared to svn

2009-03-01 Thread Nick Coghlan
Martin v. Löwis wrote: > and that it takes forever Not sure about that - I *do* port my own changes, and while the merges are quicker than a full recompile or running the test suite, they're still far, far, slower than applying an equivalent patch or doing an svn update. Given that "svnmerge bloc