Martin v. Löwis wrote:
It would be nice to get this issue resolved out for 2.6.4:
http://bugs.python.org/issue4120
The problem is that extensions built with 2.6.x will not work
when used with a User-only installation of Python on machines that
don't already have the MS VC90 CRT DLLs
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:52 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 08:27 AM 10/13/2009 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Are we on track to release 2.6.4 final this Sunday or do we need
another rc?
Yesterday, Tarek committed another setuptools related fix and said
that he was going to run
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:30 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
One identical to test_build_ext_path_with_os_sep, but that explicitly uses a
'/' (rather than os.sep) will identify the problem I'm referring to, when
run on Windows.
It's common practice to use /-separated paths in
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
As this bug already exists in 2.6.2, I don't think the change is
eligible for 2.6.4.
In addition, I want to review it, which I won't be able to until
Sunday.
Then I'd suggest to wait another week with 2.6.4 to give you a
chance to look at the patch.
That won't
On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
I still need to do some more tests, I didn't have time to try the
various projects under win32.
It's planned to night.
The tests are consisting of compiling and insatling a dozain of
projects on linux and win32 (and bith when possible)
Great
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:01 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Then I'd suggest to wait another week with 2.6.4 to give you a
chance to look at the patch.
That's not a good option, IMO. We have a known broken 2.6.3 out there
and we owe it to our users to correct our mistake and
On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:07 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Would it be reasonable to shorten that period, if the fix for the
mentioned problem gets ready for prime time earlier ?
I think there are many 2.6.x bugs queued up for after 2.6.4 is
released. I'm not at all opposed to setting a date
On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
I still need to do some more tests, I didn't have time to try the
various projects under win32.
It's planned to night.
The tests are consisting of compiling and insatling a dozain of
projects
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 at 12:57, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 13, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Tarek Ziad? wrote:
I still need to do some more tests, I didn't have time to try the
various projects under win32.
It's planned to night.
The tests are consisting of compiling and insatling a dozain of
projects on
On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:41 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
I always thought that the idea of a release candidate was that if
there
were any fixes _at all_ that there would be a new rc. Only when no
bugs needing fixed are found does the rc turn into the actual release.
But I understand that this is
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:07 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Would it be reasonable to shorten that period, if the fix for the
mentioned problem gets ready for prime time earlier ?
I think there are many 2.6.x bugs queued up for after 2.6.4 is
released. I'm not at all opposed to
On Oct 13, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File umbrella_rules.py, line 6, in module
UmbrellaRule()
File unbrella_rules.py, line 4, in UmbrellaRule
raise
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:52 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 08:27 AM 10/13/2009 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Are we on track to release 2.6.4 final this Sunday or do we need
another rc?
Yesterday, Tarek
I strongly urge another release candidate. But then, I am not doing the
work, so take that advice for what it is...
On Oct 14, 2009 10:18 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Oct 13, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: I always thought that
the idea of a release ...
No, but let's do
On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:15 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
So, we can either make Sunday's release rc2 and do the final
release one
week later, or I can try to get an rc2 out in the next day or two,
with
a final release mid-next week.
Thoughts?
I won't be able to produce Windows binaries until
15 matches
Mail list logo
