On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 08:13, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Victor Stinner wrote:
> > It's look like the repository is ok.
>
> I confirmed this by looking at what Senthil's commit actually did on the
> Python 2.6 branch - it just added some redundant info to the beginning
> of the svnmerge-integrated pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/23/2010 04:13 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I'm not sure if there should be any change in the wording of the FAQ
> entry for this - maybe expanding on the last sentence a bit?
>
> Current: "This is a one-time operation."
> Possible change: "This is
Alexandre Vassalotti wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I'm not sure if there should be any change in the wording of the FAQ
entry for this - maybe expanding on the last sentence a bit?
Could we put a commit hook to prevent committing unintentional
"svnmerge.py init
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I'm not sure if there should be any change in the wording of the FAQ
> entry for this - maybe expanding on the last sentence a bit?
>
Could we put a commit hook to prevent committing unintentional
"svnmerge.py init"?
-- Alexandre
__
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:13:54 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I'm not sure if there should be any change in the wording of the FAQ
> entry for this - maybe expanding on the last sentence a bit?
>
> Current: "This is a one-time operation."
> Possible change: "This is a one-time operation (i.e. only wh
Victor Stinner wrote:
> It's look like the repository is ok.
I confirmed this by looking at what Senthil's commit actually did on the
Python 2.6 branch - it just added some redundant info to the beginning
of the svnmerge-integrated property.
As that redundant info is no longer present, I expect s
Le mardi 23 mars 2010 12:00:15, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Victor Stinner
>
> wrote:
> > Why are you using svn init? It was already done in all branches.
>
> I had this understanding that, while using svnmerge.py you might to do
> one-time operation on svnmerge.py init
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Why are you using svn init? It was already done in all branches.
I had this understanding that, while using svnmerge.py you might to do
one-time operation on svnmerge.py init on local repo and then do the
svnmerge.py merge -r xxx
http://ww
Le mardi 23 mars 2010 10:42:00, Senthil Kumaran a écrit :
> I had to reinstall my OS recently and I checked out pristine copies of
> trunk,py3k,release26-maint,release31-maint.
>
> While svnmerge.py init on release26-maint and release31-maint worked
> fine and I was able to merge a revision to rel
I had to reinstall my OS recently and I checked out pristine copies of
trunk,py3k,release26-maint,release31-maint.
While svnmerge.py init on release26-maint and release31-maint worked
fine and I was able to merge a revision to release26-maint.
On py3k, the svn init gave the following problem.
$
10 matches
Mail list logo